Objective To compare disease course in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) with a poor prognosis who were treated with one or with two intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) courses. Methods From the International GBS Outcome Study, we selected patients whose modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score at week 1 predicted a poor prognosis. We compared those treated with one IVIg course to those treated with two IVIg courses. The primary endpoint, the GBS disability scale at 4 weeks, was assessed with multivariable ordinal regression. Results Of 237 eligible patients, 199 patients received a single IVIg course. Twenty patients received an α early' second IVIg course (1-2 weeks after start of the first IVIg course) and 18 patients a α late' second IVIg course (2-4 weeks after start of IVIg). At baseline and 1 week, those receiving two IVIg courses were more disabled than those receiving one course. Compared with the one course group, the adjusted OR for a better GBS disability score at 4 weeks was 0.70 (95%CI 0.16 to 3.04) for the early group and 0.66 (95%CI 0.18 to 2.50) for the late group. The secondary endpoints were not in favour of a second IVIg course. Conclusions This observational study did not show better outcomes after a second IVIg course in GBS with poor prognosis. The study was limited by small numbers and baseline imbalances. Lack of improvement was likely an incentive to start a second IVIg course. A prospective randomised trial is needed to evaluate whether a second IVIg course improves outcome in GBS.

Second IVIg course in Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis. The non-randomised ISID study / C., V., B., V.D.B., D. R., C., E., V., K. C., G., M. P., L., H., L., P., V.D.B., T., H., K., B., Y., P., So. H., S., S., K., J., M., Z., I., H. -P., H., G., C., B. C., J., R. A. C., H., Addington, V.D.P.A.J.M., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 0022-3050. - 91:2(2020), pp. 1-9. [10.1136/jnnp-2019-321496]

Second IVIg course in Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis. The non-randomised ISID study

G. Antonini;
2020

Abstract

Objective To compare disease course in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) with a poor prognosis who were treated with one or with two intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) courses. Methods From the International GBS Outcome Study, we selected patients whose modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score at week 1 predicted a poor prognosis. We compared those treated with one IVIg course to those treated with two IVIg courses. The primary endpoint, the GBS disability scale at 4 weeks, was assessed with multivariable ordinal regression. Results Of 237 eligible patients, 199 patients received a single IVIg course. Twenty patients received an α early' second IVIg course (1-2 weeks after start of the first IVIg course) and 18 patients a α late' second IVIg course (2-4 weeks after start of IVIg). At baseline and 1 week, those receiving two IVIg courses were more disabled than those receiving one course. Compared with the one course group, the adjusted OR for a better GBS disability score at 4 weeks was 0.70 (95%CI 0.16 to 3.04) for the early group and 0.66 (95%CI 0.18 to 2.50) for the late group. The secondary endpoints were not in favour of a second IVIg course. Conclusions This observational study did not show better outcomes after a second IVIg course in GBS with poor prognosis. The study was limited by small numbers and baseline imbalances. Lack of improvement was likely an incentive to start a second IVIg course. A prospective randomised trial is needed to evaluate whether a second IVIg course improves outcome in GBS.
2020
guillain-barré syndrome; poor prognosis; second ivig course; treatment; adult; aged; disability evaluation; female; guillain-barre syndrome; humans; immunoglobulin g; immunoglobulins; intravenous; immunologic factors; male; middle aged; prognosis; time factors; treatment outcome; drug administration schedule
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Second IVIg course in Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis. The non-randomised ISID study / C., V., B., V.D.B., D. R., C., E., V., K. C., G., M. P., L., H., L., P., V.D.B., T., H., K., B., Y., P., So. H., S., S., K., J., M., Z., I., H. -P., H., G., C., B. C., J., R. A. C., H., Addington, V.D.P.A.J.M., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 0022-3050. - 91:2(2020), pp. 1-9. [10.1136/jnnp-2019-321496]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Verboon_Second-IVIg-course_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Epub 2019 Oct 5.
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1509595
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 21
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact