Objectives The aim of this study was to compare different surgical approaches during a D2 gastrectomy. The IMIGASTRIC database was used to analyze short - term and long - term data. This is a comparative study on three treatment arms. Data were extracted from the IMIGASTRIC database considering only D2 procedures. Then a propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential selection bias. After assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, a total of 1142 patients were analyzed: 258 in the robotic group, 258 in the laparoscopic group, and 626 in the open group. Among the main outcomes operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay had a statistical significant difference (P<0.001). The median follow - up time was 24 months. Kaplan-meiers curves of survival didn't show differences. Overall survival rates at 2, 3 and 5 years were 90%, 85% and 60% in the robotic group, 93%, 88% and 64% in the laparoscopic group, 86%, 81% e 56% in the open group. This study compared a large sample of patients showing differences in perioperative results and similar survival at the oncological follow-up.

A case matched analysis from the IMIGASTRIC database to compare robotic, laparoscopic and open / Di Nardo, D.; Desiderio, J.; Trastulli, S.; Gemini, A.; Eberspacher, C.; Ricci, F.; Palazzini, G.; Parisi ., A.. - (2019). ((Intervento presentato al convegno INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS PRAGUE 2019 tenutosi a PRAGA.

A case matched analysis from the IMIGASTRIC database to compare robotic, laparoscopic and open

D. Di Nardo
;
J. Desiderio;C. Eberspacher;G. Palazzini;
2019

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare different surgical approaches during a D2 gastrectomy. The IMIGASTRIC database was used to analyze short - term and long - term data. This is a comparative study on three treatment arms. Data were extracted from the IMIGASTRIC database considering only D2 procedures. Then a propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential selection bias. After assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, a total of 1142 patients were analyzed: 258 in the robotic group, 258 in the laparoscopic group, and 626 in the open group. Among the main outcomes operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay had a statistical significant difference (P<0.001). The median follow - up time was 24 months. Kaplan-meiers curves of survival didn't show differences. Overall survival rates at 2, 3 and 5 years were 90%, 85% and 60% in the robotic group, 93%, 88% and 64% in the laparoscopic group, 86%, 81% e 56% in the open group. This study compared a large sample of patients showing differences in perioperative results and similar survival at the oncological follow-up.
INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS PRAGUE 2019
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
A case matched analysis from the IMIGASTRIC database to compare robotic, laparoscopic and open / Di Nardo, D.; Desiderio, J.; Trastulli, S.; Gemini, A.; Eberspacher, C.; Ricci, F.; Palazzini, G.; Parisi ., A.. - (2019). ((Intervento presentato al convegno INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS PRAGUE 2019 tenutosi a PRAGA.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1504290
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact