Background: Different imaging methods have been used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As there are increasing literature data about the role of radiolabelled choline PET/CT in this setting, we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis about the detection rate (DR) of this imaging method in HCC. Methods: A comprehensive computer literature search of studies published through December 2018 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library databases regarding the DR of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in patients with HCC was carried out. Pooled DR were calculated on a per patient- and on a per lesion-based analysis. Subgroup analyses taking into account the radiopharmaceutical used were performed. Results: Nine studies (283 HCC patients) were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled DR of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT on a per patient- and on a per lesion-based analysis was 83% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 75–89%] and 79% (95% CI 72–86%), respectively. A significant heterogeneity among the studies was found on a per lesion-based analysis only. No significant publication bias was found. The subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards a higher DR when using 18F-choline compared to 11C-choline, without a statistically significant difference. Pooled DR of HCC using dual-tracer PET/CT (radiolabelled choline and 18F-FDG) on a per patient- and a per lesion-based analysis was 91% (95% CI 87–95%) and 89% (95% CI 80–95%), respectively, without significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Radiolabelled choline PET/CT demonstrated good ability in detecting HCC. The DR increased when dual-tracer PET/CT was performed. Large multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
Detection rate of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis / Signore, G.; Nicod-Lalonde, M.; Prior, J. O.; Bertagna, F.; Muoio, B.; Giovanella, L.; Furlan, C.; Treglia, G.. - In: CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING. - ISSN 2281-5872. - 7:4(2019), pp. 237-253. [10.1007/s40336-019-00332-5]
Detection rate of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Furlan C.;
2019
Abstract
Background: Different imaging methods have been used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As there are increasing literature data about the role of radiolabelled choline PET/CT in this setting, we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis about the detection rate (DR) of this imaging method in HCC. Methods: A comprehensive computer literature search of studies published through December 2018 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library databases regarding the DR of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in patients with HCC was carried out. Pooled DR were calculated on a per patient- and on a per lesion-based analysis. Subgroup analyses taking into account the radiopharmaceutical used were performed. Results: Nine studies (283 HCC patients) were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled DR of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT on a per patient- and on a per lesion-based analysis was 83% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 75–89%] and 79% (95% CI 72–86%), respectively. A significant heterogeneity among the studies was found on a per lesion-based analysis only. No significant publication bias was found. The subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards a higher DR when using 18F-choline compared to 11C-choline, without a statistically significant difference. Pooled DR of HCC using dual-tracer PET/CT (radiolabelled choline and 18F-FDG) on a per patient- and a per lesion-based analysis was 91% (95% CI 87–95%) and 89% (95% CI 80–95%), respectively, without significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Radiolabelled choline PET/CT demonstrated good ability in detecting HCC. The DR increased when dual-tracer PET/CT was performed. Large multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Signore_Detection_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.14 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.14 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.