The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high-risk patients. To overcome infections and failure of transvenous leads, the most frightening complications of conventional ICDs, a completely subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) has been developed and is currently adopted in routine clinical practice. In view of their long life-expectancy, low competitive risk of dying from non-arrhythmic causes, and high lifetime risk of lead-related complications requiring surgical revisions, young patients with cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes have traditionally been considered ideal candidates for the S-ICD. However, as growing evidence supported S-ICD safety and efficacy, initial niche implant indications were abandoned in favor of a widespread use of this technology, that is currently adopted in common ICD candidates with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Indeed, guidelines recommend S-ICD implantation as an alternative to TV-ICDs in all ICD candidates, unless pacing is required. This review focuses on the contemporary experience with the S-ICD and explores future scenarios in which device-to-device communication will enable to combine leadless therapies.
Prevention of sudden cardiac death: focus on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator / Adduci, C.; Palano, F.; Silvetti, G.; Cosentino, P.; Francia, P.. - In: HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE & CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION. - ISSN 1120-9879. - 27:4(2020), pp. 291-297. [10.1007/s40292-020-00394-x]
Prevention of sudden cardiac death: focus on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Adduci C.;Palano F.;Silvetti G.;Francia P.
2020
Abstract
The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high-risk patients. To overcome infections and failure of transvenous leads, the most frightening complications of conventional ICDs, a completely subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) has been developed and is currently adopted in routine clinical practice. In view of their long life-expectancy, low competitive risk of dying from non-arrhythmic causes, and high lifetime risk of lead-related complications requiring surgical revisions, young patients with cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes have traditionally been considered ideal candidates for the S-ICD. However, as growing evidence supported S-ICD safety and efficacy, initial niche implant indications were abandoned in favor of a widespread use of this technology, that is currently adopted in common ICD candidates with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Indeed, guidelines recommend S-ICD implantation as an alternative to TV-ICDs in all ICD candidates, unless pacing is required. This review focuses on the contemporary experience with the S-ICD and explores future scenarios in which device-to-device communication will enable to combine leadless therapies.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Adduci_Prevention_2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Note: review
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.66 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.66 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.