The estimation of the body’s center of mass (CoM) trajectory is typically obtained using force platforms, or optoelectronic systems (OS), bounding the assessment inside a laboratory setting. The use of magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) allows for more ecological evaluations, and previous studies proposed methods based on either a single sensor or a sensors’ network. In this study, we compared the accuracy of two methods based on MIMUs. Body CoM was estimated during six postural tasks performed by 15 healthy subjects, using data collected by a single sensor on the pelvis (Strapdown Integration Method, SDI), and seven sensors on the pelvis and lower limbs (Biomechanical Model, BM). The accuracy of the two methods was compared in terms of RMSE and estimation of posturographic parameters, using an OS as reference. The RMSE of the SDI was lower in tasks with little or no oscillations, while the BM outperformed in tasks with greater CoM displacement. Moreover, higher correlation coefficients were obtained between the posturographic parameters obtained with the BM and the OS. Our findings showed that the estimation of CoM displacement based on MIMU was reasonably accurate, and the use of the inertial sensors network methods should be preferred to estimate the kinematic parameters.

Estimation of human center of mass position through the inertial sensors-based methods in postural tasks: an accuracy evaluation / Germanotta, Marco; Mileti, Ilaria; Conforti, Ilaria; Del Prete, Zaccaria; Aprile, Irene; Palermo, Eduardo. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 21:2(2021). [10.3390/s21020601]

Estimation of human center of mass position through the inertial sensors-based methods in postural tasks: an accuracy evaluation

Mileti, Ilaria
;
Conforti, Ilaria;Del Prete, Zaccaria;Palermo, Eduardo
2021

Abstract

The estimation of the body’s center of mass (CoM) trajectory is typically obtained using force platforms, or optoelectronic systems (OS), bounding the assessment inside a laboratory setting. The use of magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) allows for more ecological evaluations, and previous studies proposed methods based on either a single sensor or a sensors’ network. In this study, we compared the accuracy of two methods based on MIMUs. Body CoM was estimated during six postural tasks performed by 15 healthy subjects, using data collected by a single sensor on the pelvis (Strapdown Integration Method, SDI), and seven sensors on the pelvis and lower limbs (Biomechanical Model, BM). The accuracy of the two methods was compared in terms of RMSE and estimation of posturographic parameters, using an OS as reference. The RMSE of the SDI was lower in tasks with little or no oscillations, while the BM outperformed in tasks with greater CoM displacement. Moreover, higher correlation coefficients were obtained between the posturographic parameters obtained with the BM and the OS. Our findings showed that the estimation of CoM displacement based on MIMU was reasonably accurate, and the use of the inertial sensors network methods should be preferred to estimate the kinematic parameters.
2021
CoM displacement; IMUs; balance; posturography; human kinematic measurement
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Estimation of human center of mass position through the inertial sensors-based methods in postural tasks: an accuracy evaluation / Germanotta, Marco; Mileti, Ilaria; Conforti, Ilaria; Del Prete, Zaccaria; Aprile, Irene; Palermo, Eduardo. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 21:2(2021). [10.3390/s21020601]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Germanotta_Estimation-of-Human_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020601
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.86 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1491885
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact