The paper deals with the idea of binding precedent in constitutional adjudication, addressing the case of the US Supreme Court jurisprudence. Moving from its recent conflicts on the issue, especially exacerbated by the originalist polemics, the paper aims at tackling the most conventional assumptions surrounding this common law experience. It pauses on the absence of shared understandings of the stare decisis doctrine and advises for a deeper theoretical commitment in its uses related to the constitutional interpretation.
Stare decisis e interpretazione costituzionale / Cezzi, NICOLA GIOVANNI. - In: NOMOS. - ISSN 2279-7238. - Anno 2020:3(2020), pp. 1-20.
Stare decisis e interpretazione costituzionale
Nicola Giovanni Cezzi
2020
Abstract
The paper deals with the idea of binding precedent in constitutional adjudication, addressing the case of the US Supreme Court jurisprudence. Moving from its recent conflicts on the issue, especially exacerbated by the originalist polemics, the paper aims at tackling the most conventional assumptions surrounding this common law experience. It pauses on the absence of shared understandings of the stare decisis doctrine and advises for a deeper theoretical commitment in its uses related to the constitutional interpretation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cezzi_Stare-decisis_2020.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
403.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
403.77 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.