Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy is an attractive alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but its use is currently discouraged due to safety concerns.

Background: Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy is an attractive alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but its use is currently discouraged due to safety concerns. Methods: We studied 33 consecutive patients (age, 43 ± 13 years; 20 men and 13 women) with acute PE and contraindications to thrombolytic therapy who had rheolytic thrombectomy with the AngioJet catheter (Boston Scientific). Acute massive PE was initially diagnosed by computed tomography and then confirmed by pulmonary angiography. Pulmonary thrombus location was evaluated prior to the procedure. Anemia was defined as a decrease in hematocrit level <39% for men and <36% for women. Renal failure was defined as oliguria (urine output <500 mL/24 hours) or an increase in creatinine (>25% over baseline or an overall increase by 1 g/dL). Results: Catheter thrombectomy resulted in angiographic improvement in 32 patients (96%), with a rapid amelioration in functional class (from 3.3 ± 0.9 to 2.1 ± 0.7; P<.001) and an increase in oxygen saturation (from 71 ± 15% to 92 ± 17%; P<.001). No patient died. Side effects included transient heart block (n = 1), hypotension (n = 3), and bradycardia (n = 5). Anemia occurred in 4 patients, while renal failure was not detected. Clinical improvement was maintained during follow-up. At 1 year, systolic pulmonary pressure was significantly lower than at baseline (65 ± 31 mm Hg vs 31 ± 19 mm Hg; P<.001). Conclusions: Catheter thrombectomy with AngioJet in patients with acute massive PE and contraindications to thrombolysis is an effective therapeutic alternative that is not associated with relevant and persistent side effects, including the risk of death or developing anemia and renal failure.

Safety and outcome of rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism / Pelliccia, Francesco; De Luca, Alessandra; Pasceri, Vincenzo; Tanzilli, Gaetano; Speciale, Giulio; Gaudio, Carlo. - In: THE JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1557-2501. - 32:11(2020), pp. 412-416.

Safety and outcome of rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism

Pelliccia, Francesco
;
De Luca, Alessandra;Tanzilli, Gaetano;Gaudio, Carlo
2020

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy is an attractive alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but its use is currently discouraged due to safety concerns. Methods: We studied 33 consecutive patients (age, 43 ± 13 years; 20 men and 13 women) with acute PE and contraindications to thrombolytic therapy who had rheolytic thrombectomy with the AngioJet catheter (Boston Scientific). Acute massive PE was initially diagnosed by computed tomography and then confirmed by pulmonary angiography. Pulmonary thrombus location was evaluated prior to the procedure. Anemia was defined as a decrease in hematocrit level <39% for men and <36% for women. Renal failure was defined as oliguria (urine output <500 mL/24 hours) or an increase in creatinine (>25% over baseline or an overall increase by 1 g/dL). Results: Catheter thrombectomy resulted in angiographic improvement in 32 patients (96%), with a rapid amelioration in functional class (from 3.3 ± 0.9 to 2.1 ± 0.7; P<.001) and an increase in oxygen saturation (from 71 ± 15% to 92 ± 17%; P<.001). No patient died. Side effects included transient heart block (n = 1), hypotension (n = 3), and bradycardia (n = 5). Anemia occurred in 4 patients, while renal failure was not detected. Clinical improvement was maintained during follow-up. At 1 year, systolic pulmonary pressure was significantly lower than at baseline (65 ± 31 mm Hg vs 31 ± 19 mm Hg; P<.001). Conclusions: Catheter thrombectomy with AngioJet in patients with acute massive PE and contraindications to thrombolysis is an effective therapeutic alternative that is not associated with relevant and persistent side effects, including the risk of death or developing anemia and renal failure.
2020
Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy is an attractive alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but its use is currently discouraged due to safety concerns.
pulmonary embolism; rheolytic thrombectomy; thrombolysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Safety and outcome of rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism / Pelliccia, Francesco; De Luca, Alessandra; Pasceri, Vincenzo; Tanzilli, Gaetano; Speciale, Giulio; Gaudio, Carlo. - In: THE JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1557-2501. - 32:11(2020), pp. 412-416.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pelliccia_Safety_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 851 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
851 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1488800
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact