OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to identify the best evidence to define rehabilitative approaches to acute and post-acute phases of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease. METHODS: A literature search (of PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro and Cochrane databases) was perform-ed for relevant publications from January to April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 2,835 articles were retrieved, and the search resulted in a final total 31 published arti-cles. A narrative synthesis of the selected articles was then performed. Some studies examine the effect of the pandemic on rehabilitation services and provide suggestions for a new reorganization of these services. Other studies focus on COVID-19 sequelae, formulating recommendations for rehabilitative interventions. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 patients, an integrated rehabilitative process is recommended, involving a multidisciplinary and multi-professional team provid-ing neuromuscular, cardiac, respiratory, and swallowing interventions, and psychological support, in order to improve patients' quality of life. The intervention of a physician expert in rehabilitation should assess the patient, and a dedicated intervention set up after thorough assessment of the patient's clinical condition, in collaboration with all rehabilitation team professionals.

Rehabilitation setting during and after Covid-19: an overview on recommendations / Agostini, F.; Mangone, M.; Ruiu, P.; Paolucci, T.; Santilli, V.; Bernetti, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 1651-2081. - 53:1(2021), pp. 1-10. [10.2340/16501977-2776]

Rehabilitation setting during and after Covid-19: an overview on recommendations

Agostini F.
;
Mangone M.;Ruiu P.;Santilli V.;Bernetti A.
2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to identify the best evidence to define rehabilitative approaches to acute and post-acute phases of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease. METHODS: A literature search (of PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro and Cochrane databases) was perform-ed for relevant publications from January to April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 2,835 articles were retrieved, and the search resulted in a final total 31 published arti-cles. A narrative synthesis of the selected articles was then performed. Some studies examine the effect of the pandemic on rehabilitation services and provide suggestions for a new reorganization of these services. Other studies focus on COVID-19 sequelae, formulating recommendations for rehabilitative interventions. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 patients, an integrated rehabilitative process is recommended, involving a multidisciplinary and multi-professional team provid-ing neuromuscular, cardiac, respiratory, and swallowing interventions, and psychological support, in order to improve patients' quality of life. The intervention of a physician expert in rehabilitation should assess the patient, and a dedicated intervention set up after thorough assessment of the patient's clinical condition, in collaboration with all rehabilitation team professionals.
2021
COVID-19; recommendation; rehabilitation; aftercare; anxiety; COVID-19; humans; pandemics; patient care team; quality of life; SARS-CoV-2
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Rehabilitation setting during and after Covid-19: an overview on recommendations / Agostini, F.; Mangone, M.; Ruiu, P.; Paolucci, T.; Santilli, V.; Bernetti, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 1651-2081. - 53:1(2021), pp. 1-10. [10.2340/16501977-2776]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Agostini_Rehabilitation_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 368.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
368.63 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1487996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 34
  • Scopus 69
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 60
social impact