Laparoscopic resections for rectal cancer are routinely performed in high-volume centres. Despite short-term advantages have been demonstrated, the oncological outcomes are still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological adequateness of the surgical specimen and the long-term outcomes between open (ORR) and laparoscopic (LRR) rectal resections.
Laparoscopic versus open rectal resection. a 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis of oncological adequateness, short- and long-term outcomes / Garbarino, Giovanni Maria; Canali, Giulia; Tarantino, Giulia; Costa, Gianluca; Ferri, Mario; Balducci, Genoveffa; Pilozzi, Emanuela; Berardi, Giammauro; Mercantini, Paolo. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE. - ISSN 0179-1958. - (2021). [10.1007/s00384-021-03841-w]
Laparoscopic versus open rectal resection. a 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis of oncological adequateness, short- and long-term outcomes
Garbarino, Giovanni Maria;Canali, Giulia;Tarantino, Giulia;Ferri, Mario;Balducci, Genoveffa;Pilozzi, Emanuela;Berardi, Giammauro;Mercantini, Paolo
2021
Abstract
Laparoscopic resections for rectal cancer are routinely performed in high-volume centres. Despite short-term advantages have been demonstrated, the oncological outcomes are still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological adequateness of the surgical specimen and the long-term outcomes between open (ORR) and laparoscopic (LRR) rectal resections.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Garbarino_Laparoscopic-versus_2021.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
3.07 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.07 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
