The article casts doubt on the constitutional legitimacy of art. 4 of Italian law n. 219/2017, which obliges health care professionals to comply with advance health care directives un- less: a) the latter are clearly unsuitable or b) they refer to treatments other than those to be performed or c) unpredictable and effective treatments have subsequently been discovered. This rule does not contain any tools to ascertain that the advance directive is informed and that the choice made by the trustee matches that which the patient would have made if he or she had been capable. Consequently, this rule appears to be unconstitutional for the following reasons: a) it unreasonably differentiates the advance refusal compared to the current one; b) it violates the rights to life and self-determination; c) it does not protect the freedom of conscience of health professionals. The article sets forth an interpretation aimed at making this norm compatible with the Constitution.

Questioni di legittimità costituzionale della disciplina in materia di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento contenuta nell’art. 4 della legge n. 219/2017 / MONTANARI VERGALLO, Gianluca. - In: FAMILIA. - ISSN 2531-6796. - 2020:1(2020), pp. 23-43.

Questioni di legittimità costituzionale della disciplina in materia di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento contenuta nell’art. 4 della legge n. 219/2017

Gianluca Montanari Vergallo
2020

Abstract

The article casts doubt on the constitutional legitimacy of art. 4 of Italian law n. 219/2017, which obliges health care professionals to comply with advance health care directives un- less: a) the latter are clearly unsuitable or b) they refer to treatments other than those to be performed or c) unpredictable and effective treatments have subsequently been discovered. This rule does not contain any tools to ascertain that the advance directive is informed and that the choice made by the trustee matches that which the patient would have made if he or she had been capable. Consequently, this rule appears to be unconstitutional for the following reasons: a) it unreasonably differentiates the advance refusal compared to the current one; b) it violates the rights to life and self-determination; c) it does not protect the freedom of conscience of health professionals. The article sets forth an interpretation aimed at making this norm compatible with the Constitution.
2020
disposizioni anticipate di trattamento; diritto alla vita; libertà di autodeterminazione; principio di ragionevolezza; legittimità costituzionale
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Questioni di legittimità costituzionale della disciplina in materia di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento contenuta nell’art. 4 della legge n. 219/2017 / MONTANARI VERGALLO, Gianluca. - In: FAMILIA. - ISSN 2531-6796. - 2020:1(2020), pp. 23-43.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Montanari Vergallo_Questioni-di-legittimità_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 270.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
270.54 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1481695
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact