There is an ongoing debate on the involvement of systemic copper (Cu) dysfunctions in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and clinical studies comparing Cu levels in serum, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients with those of healthy controls have delivered non-univocal and often conflicting results. In an attempt to evaluate whether Cu should be considered a potential marker of AD, we applied meta-analysis to a selection of 26 studies published in the literature. Meta-analysis is a quantitative method that combines the results of independent reports to distinguish between small effects and no effects, random variations, variations in sample used, or in different analytical approaches. The subjects' sample obtained by merging studies was a pooled total of 761 AD subjects and 664 controls for serum Cu studies, 205 AD subjects and 167 controls for plasma Cu, and of 116 AD subjects and 129 controls for CSF Cu. Our meta-analysis of serum data showed that AD patients have higher levels of serum Cu than healthy controls. Plasma data did not allow conclusions, due to their high heterogeneity, but the meta-analysis of the combined serum and plasma studies confirmed higher Cu levels in AD. The analysis of CSF data, instead, revealed no difference between AD patients and controls. © 2011 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.

Copper in alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of serum,plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid studies / Bucossi, S.; Ventriglia, M.; Panetta, V.; Salustri, C.; Pasqualetti, P.; Mariani, S.; Siotto, M.; Rossini, P. M.; Squitti, R.. - In: JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. - ISSN 1387-2877. - 24:1(2011), pp. 175-185. [10.3233/JAD-2010-101473]

Copper in alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of serum,plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid studies

Pasqualetti P.;
2011

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate on the involvement of systemic copper (Cu) dysfunctions in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and clinical studies comparing Cu levels in serum, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients with those of healthy controls have delivered non-univocal and often conflicting results. In an attempt to evaluate whether Cu should be considered a potential marker of AD, we applied meta-analysis to a selection of 26 studies published in the literature. Meta-analysis is a quantitative method that combines the results of independent reports to distinguish between small effects and no effects, random variations, variations in sample used, or in different analytical approaches. The subjects' sample obtained by merging studies was a pooled total of 761 AD subjects and 664 controls for serum Cu studies, 205 AD subjects and 167 controls for plasma Cu, and of 116 AD subjects and 129 controls for CSF Cu. Our meta-analysis of serum data showed that AD patients have higher levels of serum Cu than healthy controls. Plasma data did not allow conclusions, due to their high heterogeneity, but the meta-analysis of the combined serum and plasma studies confirmed higher Cu levels in AD. The analysis of CSF data, instead, revealed no difference between AD patients and controls. © 2011 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
2011
Alzheimer's disease; cerebrospinal fluid; copper; meta-analysis; plasma; serum
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Copper in alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of serum,plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid studies / Bucossi, S.; Ventriglia, M.; Panetta, V.; Salustri, C.; Pasqualetti, P.; Mariani, S.; Siotto, M.; Rossini, P. M.; Squitti, R.. - In: JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. - ISSN 1387-2877. - 24:1(2011), pp. 175-185. [10.3233/JAD-2010-101473]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1481025
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 112
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 100
social impact