Objectives: Several randomized controlled trials have compared adrenaline (epinephrine) with alternative therapies in patients with cardiac arrest with conflicting results. Recent observational studies suggest that adrenaline might increase return of spontaneous circulation but worsen neurologic outcome. We systematically compared all the vasopressors tested in randomized controlled trials in adult cardiac arrest patients in order to identify the treatment associated with the highest rate of return of spontaneous circulation, survival, and good neurologic outcome. Design: Network meta-analysis. Patients: Adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Interventions: PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, and the Cochrane Central register were searched (up to April 1, 2017). We included all the randomized controlled trials comparing a vasopressor with any other therapy. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was performed to identify the treatment associated with the highest likelihood of survival. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight studies randomizing 14,848 patients in 12 treatment groups were included. Only a combined treatment with adrenaline, vasopressin, and methylprednisolone was associated with increased likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation and survival with a good neurologic outcome compared with several other comparators, including adrenaline. Adrenaline alone was not associated with any significant difference in mortality and good neurologic outcome compared with any other comparator. Conclusions: In randomized controlled trials assessing vasopressors in adults with cardiac arrest, only a combination of adrenaline, vasopressin, and methylprednisolone was associated with improved survival with a good neurologic outcome compared with any other drug or placebo, particularly in in-hospital cardiac arrest. There was no significant randomized evidence to support neither discourage the use of adrenaline during cardiac arrest.

Vasopressors during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials / Belletti, A.; Benedetto, U.; Putzu, A.; Martino, E. A.; Biondi-Zoccai, G.; Angelini, G. D.; Zangrillo, A.; Landoni, G.. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0090-3493. - 46:5(2018), pp. e443-e451. [10.1097/CCM.0000000000003049]

Vasopressors during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Benedetto U.;Biondi-Zoccai G.;
2018

Abstract

Objectives: Several randomized controlled trials have compared adrenaline (epinephrine) with alternative therapies in patients with cardiac arrest with conflicting results. Recent observational studies suggest that adrenaline might increase return of spontaneous circulation but worsen neurologic outcome. We systematically compared all the vasopressors tested in randomized controlled trials in adult cardiac arrest patients in order to identify the treatment associated with the highest rate of return of spontaneous circulation, survival, and good neurologic outcome. Design: Network meta-analysis. Patients: Adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Interventions: PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, and the Cochrane Central register were searched (up to April 1, 2017). We included all the randomized controlled trials comparing a vasopressor with any other therapy. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was performed to identify the treatment associated with the highest likelihood of survival. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight studies randomizing 14,848 patients in 12 treatment groups were included. Only a combined treatment with adrenaline, vasopressin, and methylprednisolone was associated with increased likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation and survival with a good neurologic outcome compared with several other comparators, including adrenaline. Adrenaline alone was not associated with any significant difference in mortality and good neurologic outcome compared with any other comparator. Conclusions: In randomized controlled trials assessing vasopressors in adults with cardiac arrest, only a combination of adrenaline, vasopressin, and methylprednisolone was associated with improved survival with a good neurologic outcome compared with any other drug or placebo, particularly in in-hospital cardiac arrest. There was no significant randomized evidence to support neither discourage the use of adrenaline during cardiac arrest.
2018
adrenaline; cardiac arrest; resuscitation; return of spontaneous circulation; survival; vasopressin; Adult; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Heart Arrest; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vasoconstrictor Agents
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Vasopressors during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials / Belletti, A.; Benedetto, U.; Putzu, A.; Martino, E. A.; Biondi-Zoccai, G.; Angelini, G. D.; Zangrillo, A.; Landoni, G.. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0090-3493. - 46:5(2018), pp. e443-e451. [10.1097/CCM.0000000000003049]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1474303
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact