Background: Apraxia of eyelid opening is a movement disorder characterized by an inability to raise the eyelids without any overt contractions of the orbicularis oculi muscle. There is currently no clinical scale to rate the severity of this condition. Objectives: To develop and validate a novel scale that considers phenomenological aspects relevant to the severity of the condition. Methods: The study sample included 20 patients with apraxia of eyelid opening, either isolated (9 patients) or associated with blepharospasm (11 patients). To validate the scale, selected features were checked for reliability, reliable items were combined to generate the scale, and clinimetric properties were evaluated. Results: The novel severity scale yielded acceptable reliability, scaling assumptions, internal consistency, and sensitivity to change; a lack of floor and ceiling effects; and no correlation with the blepharospasm severity rating scale. Conclusions: We propose a severity scale that considers the most relevant apraxia of eyelid opening motor abnormalities based on objective criteria. This scale can be reliably administered by general neurologists after a brief training.

Development of a Clinical Rating Scale for the Severity of Apraxia of Eyelid Opening, Either Isolated or Associated with Blepharospasm / Ferrazzano, G.; Muroni, A.; Conte, A.; Ercoli, T.; Tamburini, G.; Fabbrini, G.; Berardelli, A.; Defazio, G.. - In: MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 2330-1619. - 7:8(2020), pp. 950-954. [10.1002/mdc3.13083]

Development of a Clinical Rating Scale for the Severity of Apraxia of Eyelid Opening, Either Isolated or Associated with Blepharospasm

Ferrazzano G.;Muroni A.;Conte A.;Ercoli T.;Fabbrini G.;Berardelli A.;
2020

Abstract

Background: Apraxia of eyelid opening is a movement disorder characterized by an inability to raise the eyelids without any overt contractions of the orbicularis oculi muscle. There is currently no clinical scale to rate the severity of this condition. Objectives: To develop and validate a novel scale that considers phenomenological aspects relevant to the severity of the condition. Methods: The study sample included 20 patients with apraxia of eyelid opening, either isolated (9 patients) or associated with blepharospasm (11 patients). To validate the scale, selected features were checked for reliability, reliable items were combined to generate the scale, and clinimetric properties were evaluated. Results: The novel severity scale yielded acceptable reliability, scaling assumptions, internal consistency, and sensitivity to change; a lack of floor and ceiling effects; and no correlation with the blepharospasm severity rating scale. Conclusions: We propose a severity scale that considers the most relevant apraxia of eyelid opening motor abnormalities based on objective criteria. This scale can be reliably administered by general neurologists after a brief training.
2020
dystonia, blepharospasm, apraxia of eyelid opening, basal ganglia, orbicularis oculi muscle spasm.
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Development of a Clinical Rating Scale for the Severity of Apraxia of Eyelid Opening, Either Isolated or Associated with Blepharospasm / Ferrazzano, G.; Muroni, A.; Conte, A.; Ercoli, T.; Tamburini, G.; Fabbrini, G.; Berardelli, A.; Defazio, G.. - In: MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 2330-1619. - 7:8(2020), pp. 950-954. [10.1002/mdc3.13083]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ferrazzano_Development_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 168.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
168.96 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1473579
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact