Wybrow & Hanley (2015) reported that proportions of phonological and surface dyslexics change depending on how control groups are selected. This observation questions the appropriateness of the reading-level match design for establishing causality in cognitive studies of reading. Here, I focus on three features: (1) the lack of an explicit definition of the reading-level concept; (2) the metric problems associated with using this design; and (3) the ambiguity of the delay-deviance contrast in interpreting reading deficits. I also delineate alternative methodological features that could effectively inform developmental designs. Thus, I argue that (a) control variables should be as independent of the target-dependent measure as possible; (b) they should be shaped within the theoretical aims of the study and be explicitly considered in the interpretation of findings; and, (c) conditions of interest should be viewed along with critically associated conditions using approaches that allow predicting the size of the expected deficit.

The reading level matched design: limitations and possible alternatives / Zoccolotti, P.. - In: COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0264-3294. - 37:7-8(2020), pp. 523-534. [10.1080/02643294.2020.1809364]

The reading level matched design: limitations and possible alternatives

Zoccolotti P.
Primo
2020

Abstract

Wybrow & Hanley (2015) reported that proportions of phonological and surface dyslexics change depending on how control groups are selected. This observation questions the appropriateness of the reading-level match design for establishing causality in cognitive studies of reading. Here, I focus on three features: (1) the lack of an explicit definition of the reading-level concept; (2) the metric problems associated with using this design; and (3) the ambiguity of the delay-deviance contrast in interpreting reading deficits. I also delineate alternative methodological features that could effectively inform developmental designs. Thus, I argue that (a) control variables should be as independent of the target-dependent measure as possible; (b) they should be shaped within the theoretical aims of the study and be explicitly considered in the interpretation of findings; and, (c) conditions of interest should be viewed along with critically associated conditions using approaches that allow predicting the size of the expected deficit.
2020
age equivalents; control group; non-word reading; reading age; reading level
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
The reading level matched design: limitations and possible alternatives / Zoccolotti, P.. - In: COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0264-3294. - 37:7-8(2020), pp. 523-534. [10.1080/02643294.2020.1809364]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Zoccolotti__Reading-level_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1472371
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact