The current health emergency caused by the COVID19 pandemic has caused an abrupt reduction in all ordinary endoscopic activities [1]. Our endoscopy unit, usually overloaded with procedures, has reduced its activities to immediate urgencies only, as recommended by position statements of many scientific societies [2–4]. After the most critical phase of the emergency, the need to evaluate the relative urgency of the endoscopic procedures was addressed. In our endoscopic academic tertiary referral unit, about 300 endoscopic procedures from March 16 to May 2 were suspended. According to local (hospital) and regional health department indications, outpatient services have been reorganised, by remodulating time slots for procedures, controlling and filtering patients’ access to the unit and reviewing the indications for each single endoscopic procedure programmed but not performed. Procedures initially classified as urgent (by 48 hours, n. 77) and short (by 10 days, n. 68) were directly rescheduled and performed. Furthermore, we decided to interview all the patients of postponed endoscopic procedures by phone calls carried out by trainees, tutored by a senior component of the endoscopy unit. A systematic questionnaire was developed based on the following items: demographic and clinical patient characteristics, current conditions, gastrointestinal signs and symptoms, exam indications and priority classes assigned by the general practitioner or other physicians, time and results of previous endoscopic examinations, laboratory tests, ongoing treatments. Results of the phone interview and any additional clinical documentation e-mailed by the patient was evaluated and archived including date and time of the interview with the patient’s informed consent. Based on the results of the reassessment, patients were rescheduled stratifing the procedures in the following 4 priority cla
Who comes first. rescheduling endoscopic activity after the acute phase of the Covid 19 pandemic / Tripodi, G.; Dilaghi, E.; Fanella, S.; Corleto, V. D.; Giulio, E. D.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 52:8(2020), pp. 829-830. [10.1016/j.dld.2020.06.032]
Who comes first. rescheduling endoscopic activity after the acute phase of the Covid 19 pandemic
Dilaghi E.
;Fanella S.
;Corleto V. D.;Giulio E. D.
2020
Abstract
The current health emergency caused by the COVID19 pandemic has caused an abrupt reduction in all ordinary endoscopic activities [1]. Our endoscopy unit, usually overloaded with procedures, has reduced its activities to immediate urgencies only, as recommended by position statements of many scientific societies [2–4]. After the most critical phase of the emergency, the need to evaluate the relative urgency of the endoscopic procedures was addressed. In our endoscopic academic tertiary referral unit, about 300 endoscopic procedures from March 16 to May 2 were suspended. According to local (hospital) and regional health department indications, outpatient services have been reorganised, by remodulating time slots for procedures, controlling and filtering patients’ access to the unit and reviewing the indications for each single endoscopic procedure programmed but not performed. Procedures initially classified as urgent (by 48 hours, n. 77) and short (by 10 days, n. 68) were directly rescheduled and performed. Furthermore, we decided to interview all the patients of postponed endoscopic procedures by phone calls carried out by trainees, tutored by a senior component of the endoscopy unit. A systematic questionnaire was developed based on the following items: demographic and clinical patient characteristics, current conditions, gastrointestinal signs and symptoms, exam indications and priority classes assigned by the general practitioner or other physicians, time and results of previous endoscopic examinations, laboratory tests, ongoing treatments. Results of the phone interview and any additional clinical documentation e-mailed by the patient was evaluated and archived including date and time of the interview with the patient’s informed consent. Based on the results of the reassessment, patients were rescheduled stratifing the procedures in the following 4 priority claFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tripodi_Who-comes-first_2020.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32636180/ reso disponibile finchè l'editore lo consente
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
206.91 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
206.91 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.