We show how a simple convolutional neural network (CNN) can be trained to accurately and robustly regress 6 degrees of freedom (6DoF) 3D head pose, directly from image intensities. We further explain how this FacePoseNet (FPN) can be used to align faces in 2D and 3D as an alternative to explicit facial landmark detection for these tasks. We claim that in many cases the standard means of measuring landmark detector accuracy can be misleading when comparing different face alignments. Instead, we compare our FPN with existing methods by evaluating how they affect face recognition accuracy on the IJB-A and IJB-B benchmarks: using the same recognition pipeline, but varying the face alignment method. Our results show that (a) better landmark detection accuracy measured on the 300W benchmark does not necessarily imply better face recognition accuracy.(b) Our FPN provides superior 2D and 3D face alignment on both benchmarks. Finally,(c), FPN aligns faces at a small fraction of the computational cost of comparably accurate landmark detectors. For many purposes, FPN is thus a far faster and far more accurate face alignment method than using facial landmark detectors.

FacePoseNet: Making a case for landmark-free face alignment / Chang, Feng-Ju; Tran Anh, Tuan; Hassner, Tal; Masi, I; Nevatia, Ram; Medioni, Gerard. - (2017). (Intervento presentato al convegno IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) tenutosi a Venezia, Italia) [10.1109/ICCVW.2017.188].

FacePoseNet: Making a case for landmark-free face alignment

Masi I;
2017

Abstract

We show how a simple convolutional neural network (CNN) can be trained to accurately and robustly regress 6 degrees of freedom (6DoF) 3D head pose, directly from image intensities. We further explain how this FacePoseNet (FPN) can be used to align faces in 2D and 3D as an alternative to explicit facial landmark detection for these tasks. We claim that in many cases the standard means of measuring landmark detector accuracy can be misleading when comparing different face alignments. Instead, we compare our FPN with existing methods by evaluating how they affect face recognition accuracy on the IJB-A and IJB-B benchmarks: using the same recognition pipeline, but varying the face alignment method. Our results show that (a) better landmark detection accuracy measured on the 300W benchmark does not necessarily imply better face recognition accuracy.(b) Our FPN provides superior 2D and 3D face alignment on both benchmarks. Finally,(c), FPN aligns faces at a small fraction of the computational cost of comparably accurate landmark detectors. For many purposes, FPN is thus a far faster and far more accurate face alignment method than using facial landmark detectors.
2017
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW)
face alignment, facial landmark detector, deep learning
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
FacePoseNet: Making a case for landmark-free face alignment / Chang, Feng-Ju; Tran Anh, Tuan; Hassner, Tal; Masi, I; Nevatia, Ram; Medioni, Gerard. - (2017). (Intervento presentato al convegno IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) tenutosi a Venezia, Italia) [10.1109/ICCVW.2017.188].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1458928
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 102
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 66
social impact