OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether some nuclear features analyzed by morphometry and cytology may be useful in characterizing differently correlated endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) subgroups. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty four endocervical AGUS smears were subclassified into four subgroups on the basis of their different correlation: not otherwise specified subgroup (NOSs), tamoxifen (Ts), human papillomavirus infection (HPVs) and laser therapy (LTs). Area and shape of the atypical nuclei detected were morphometrically measured. The smears were then cytologically reviewed, and the shape and grade of expression of hyperchomasia in AGUS nuclei were analyzed. RESULTS: AGUS cases due to T therapy showed the largest nuclear area (148.845 mu m(2); P < .0000) and the greatest anisonucleosis objectively measured by morphometry. HPVs had the shape that most differed from perfectly circular (15.341 versus 14.1) and showed the highest grade of expression of nuclear density. LTs and NOSs were less well characterized than the other subgroups. CONCLUSION: Analysis of nuclear features by morphometry and cytology was useful in characterizing the AGUS subgroups Ts and HPVs.

Endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance II. Morphometric and cytologic analysis of nuclear features useful in characterizing differently correlated subgroups / M., Cenci; Mancini, Rita; Nofroni, Italo; Vecchione, Aldo. - In: ACTA CYTOLOGICA. - ISSN 0001-5547. - 44:3(2000), pp. 327-331. [10.1159/000328473]

Endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance II. Morphometric and cytologic analysis of nuclear features useful in characterizing differently correlated subgroups

MANCINI, RITA;NOFRONI, Italo;VECCHIONE, Aldo
2000

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether some nuclear features analyzed by morphometry and cytology may be useful in characterizing differently correlated endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) subgroups. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty four endocervical AGUS smears were subclassified into four subgroups on the basis of their different correlation: not otherwise specified subgroup (NOSs), tamoxifen (Ts), human papillomavirus infection (HPVs) and laser therapy (LTs). Area and shape of the atypical nuclei detected were morphometrically measured. The smears were then cytologically reviewed, and the shape and grade of expression of hyperchomasia in AGUS nuclei were analyzed. RESULTS: AGUS cases due to T therapy showed the largest nuclear area (148.845 mu m(2); P < .0000) and the greatest anisonucleosis objectively measured by morphometry. HPVs had the shape that most differed from perfectly circular (15.341 versus 14.1) and showed the highest grade of expression of nuclear density. LTs and NOSs were less well characterized than the other subgroups. CONCLUSION: Analysis of nuclear features by morphometry and cytology was useful in characterizing the AGUS subgroups Ts and HPVs.
2000
atypical glandular cells of undetermine significance; atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance; cell nucleus; cervical smears; cervix neoplasms; human papilloma virus; morphometric image analysis; tamoxifen
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance II. Morphometric and cytologic analysis of nuclear features useful in characterizing differently correlated subgroups / M., Cenci; Mancini, Rita; Nofroni, Italo; Vecchione, Aldo. - In: ACTA CYTOLOGICA. - ISSN 0001-5547. - 44:3(2000), pp. 327-331. [10.1159/000328473]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/145680
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact