Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent evidences suggest a differential impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated DM on prognosis. We evaluated the clinical outcome of diabetic patients after PCI with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent from the RUDI-FREE Registry, investigating a possible different prognostic impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated DM. A total of 1,104 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent, enrolled in the RUDI-FREE observational, multicenter, single-arm registry, were stratified by diabetic status; diabetic population was further divided on the basis of insulin treatment. Primary end points of the study were target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of cardiac death, stroke, and myocardial infarction). Multiple ischemic adverse events were also single-handedly considered as secondary end points. At 1 year, TLF was significantly higher in the diabetic cohort, as compared with nondiabetic patients (6.0% vs 3.1%, p 0.022). None of the end points resulted significantly different between nondiabetics and noninsulin-treated diabetic patients. Divergently, compared with nondiabetic, insulin-treated diabetic patients faced significant higher rates of TLF (10.8% vs 3.1%, p 0.003), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (10.8% vs 3.4%, p 0.004), and of most of the analyzed adverse events. In conclusion, patients with DM had a higher risk of TLF compared with nondiabetics; nonetheless, the worse outcome of the diabetic population seems to be driven by the insulin-treated diabetic subpopulation. This finding suggests a different risk profile of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetic patients in the modern era of PCI.

Impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetes mellitus in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent (from the RUDI-FREE registry) / Pepe, M.; Sardella, G.; Stefanini, G. G.; Corcione, N.; Nestola, P. L.; Morello, A.; Briguori, C.; Tamburino, C.; Fabbiocchi, F.; Rotolo, F. L.; Tomai, F.; Paggi, A.; Lombardi, M.; Gioffre, G.; Sclafani, R.; Rolandi, A.; Sciahbasi, A.; Scardaci, F.; Signore, N.; Mancone, M.; Giordano, A.. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9149. - 124:10(2019), pp. 1518-1527. [10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.015]

Impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetes mellitus in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent (from the RUDI-FREE registry)

Sardella G.;Mancone M.;
2019

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent evidences suggest a differential impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated DM on prognosis. We evaluated the clinical outcome of diabetic patients after PCI with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent from the RUDI-FREE Registry, investigating a possible different prognostic impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated DM. A total of 1,104 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent, enrolled in the RUDI-FREE observational, multicenter, single-arm registry, were stratified by diabetic status; diabetic population was further divided on the basis of insulin treatment. Primary end points of the study were target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of cardiac death, stroke, and myocardial infarction). Multiple ischemic adverse events were also single-handedly considered as secondary end points. At 1 year, TLF was significantly higher in the diabetic cohort, as compared with nondiabetic patients (6.0% vs 3.1%, p 0.022). None of the end points resulted significantly different between nondiabetics and noninsulin-treated diabetic patients. Divergently, compared with nondiabetic, insulin-treated diabetic patients faced significant higher rates of TLF (10.8% vs 3.1%, p 0.003), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (10.8% vs 3.4%, p 0.004), and of most of the analyzed adverse events. In conclusion, patients with DM had a higher risk of TLF compared with nondiabetics; nonetheless, the worse outcome of the diabetic population seems to be driven by the insulin-treated diabetic subpopulation. This finding suggests a different risk profile of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetic patients in the modern era of PCI.
2019
aged; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; diabetes mellitus; female; follow-up studies; humans; hypoglycemic agents; immunosuppressive agents; insulin; male; percutaneous coronary intervention; polymers; prognosis; prospective studies; prosthesis design; sirolimus; drug-eluting stents; registries
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetes mellitus in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent (from the RUDI-FREE registry) / Pepe, M.; Sardella, G.; Stefanini, G. G.; Corcione, N.; Nestola, P. L.; Morello, A.; Briguori, C.; Tamburino, C.; Fabbiocchi, F.; Rotolo, F. L.; Tomai, F.; Paggi, A.; Lombardi, M.; Gioffre, G.; Sclafani, R.; Rolandi, A.; Sciahbasi, A.; Scardaci, F.; Signore, N.; Mancone, M.; Giordano, A.. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9149. - 124:10(2019), pp. 1518-1527. [10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.015]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pepe_Impact_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 293.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
293.95 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1453665
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact