Background Current guidelines suggest to consider dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) continuation for longer than 12 months in selected patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Hypothesis We sought to assess the criteria used by cardiologists in daily practice to select patients with a history of MI eligible for DAPT continuation beyond 1 year. Methods We analyzed data from the EYESHOT Post-MI, a prospective, observational, nationwide study aimed to evaluate the management of patients presenting to cardiologists 1 to 3 years from the last MI event. Results Out of the 1633 post-MI patients enrolled in the study between March and December 2017, 557 (34.1%) were on DAPT at the time of enrolment, and 450 (27.6%) were prescribed DAPT after cardiologist assessment. At multivariate analyses, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with multiple stents and the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) resulted as independent predictors of DAPT continuation, while atrial fibrillation was the only independent predictor of DAPT interruption for patients both at the second and the third year from MI at enrolment and the time of discharge/end of the visit. Conclusions Risk scores recommended by current guidelines for guiding decisions on DAPT duration are underused and misused in clinical practice. A PCI with multiple stents and a history of PAD resulted as the clinical variables more frequently associated with DAPT continuation beyond 1 year from the index MI.

How do cardiologists select patients for dual antiplatelet therapy continuation beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction. insights from the EYESHOT post-MI study / Alessandri, Nicola. - In: CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0160-9289. - 42:11(2019), pp. 1113-1120. [10.1002/clc.23262]

How do cardiologists select patients for dual antiplatelet therapy continuation beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction. insights from the EYESHOT post-MI study

Alessandri, N. (Alessandri Nicola)
2019

Abstract

Background Current guidelines suggest to consider dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) continuation for longer than 12 months in selected patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Hypothesis We sought to assess the criteria used by cardiologists in daily practice to select patients with a history of MI eligible for DAPT continuation beyond 1 year. Methods We analyzed data from the EYESHOT Post-MI, a prospective, observational, nationwide study aimed to evaluate the management of patients presenting to cardiologists 1 to 3 years from the last MI event. Results Out of the 1633 post-MI patients enrolled in the study between March and December 2017, 557 (34.1%) were on DAPT at the time of enrolment, and 450 (27.6%) were prescribed DAPT after cardiologist assessment. At multivariate analyses, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with multiple stents and the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) resulted as independent predictors of DAPT continuation, while atrial fibrillation was the only independent predictor of DAPT interruption for patients both at the second and the third year from MI at enrolment and the time of discharge/end of the visit. Conclusions Risk scores recommended by current guidelines for guiding decisions on DAPT duration are underused and misused in clinical practice. A PCI with multiple stents and a history of PAD resulted as the clinical variables more frequently associated with DAPT continuation beyond 1 year from the index MI.
2019
clopidogrel; dual antiplatelet therapy; percutaneous coronary intervention; post-mi; secondary prevention; ticagrelor keywords plus:coronary-artery-disease; focused update; dapt score; risk; duration; intervention; management
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
How do cardiologists select patients for dual antiplatelet therapy continuation beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction. insights from the EYESHOT post-MI study / Alessandri, Nicola. - In: CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0160-9289. - 42:11(2019), pp. 1113-1120. [10.1002/clc.23262]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DeLuca_How-Do-Cardiologists_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.28 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.28 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1445030
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact