Meperidine and fentanyl are opioids currently used in addition to midazolam for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy in Italy. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of patients' psychological state before elective colonoscopy on the efficacy of the sedation regimens. Eighty outpatients who underwent an elective colonoscopy were included in our study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was self-administered to evaluate basal anxiety and depression state. The rate of baseline discomfort was evaluated by a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. Sedation was obtained alternatively with a midazolam-meperidine or midazolam-fentanyl combination. There were no statistically significant differences between the fentanyl and meperidine groups on body mass index, age, and gender composition. Patients in the meperidine group reported less pain during colonoscopy than patients in the fentanyl group. There were statistically significant positive correlations in the meperidine group with the distress, anxiety, and depression. Our study has pointed out greater effectiveness of the midazolam plus meperidine regimen, equal recovery times, and no significant differences in the duration of the endoscopic examinations. The evaluation of patients' psychological status seems to predict the efficacy of sedation when the nociceptive component of pain is well controlled.

Efficacy of sedation by midazolam in association with meperidine or fentanyl and role of patient distress during elective colonoscopy / Pontone, S.; Palma, R.; Donato, G.; Borghini, R.; Frattaroli, S.; Raniolo, M.; Panetta, C.; Lauriola, M.. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING. - ISSN 1042-895X. - 43:3(2020), pp. 258-263. [10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456]

Efficacy of sedation by midazolam in association with meperidine or fentanyl and role of patient distress during elective colonoscopy

Pontone S.;Palma R.;Donato G.;Borghini R.;Frattaroli S.;Raniolo M.;Panetta C.;Lauriola M.
2020

Abstract

Meperidine and fentanyl are opioids currently used in addition to midazolam for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy in Italy. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of patients' psychological state before elective colonoscopy on the efficacy of the sedation regimens. Eighty outpatients who underwent an elective colonoscopy were included in our study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was self-administered to evaluate basal anxiety and depression state. The rate of baseline discomfort was evaluated by a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. Sedation was obtained alternatively with a midazolam-meperidine or midazolam-fentanyl combination. There were no statistically significant differences between the fentanyl and meperidine groups on body mass index, age, and gender composition. Patients in the meperidine group reported less pain during colonoscopy than patients in the fentanyl group. There were statistically significant positive correlations in the meperidine group with the distress, anxiety, and depression. Our study has pointed out greater effectiveness of the midazolam plus meperidine regimen, equal recovery times, and no significant differences in the duration of the endoscopic examinations. The evaluation of patients' psychological status seems to predict the efficacy of sedation when the nociceptive component of pain is well controlled.
2020
sedation; colonscopy; meperidine
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Efficacy of sedation by midazolam in association with meperidine or fentanyl and role of patient distress during elective colonoscopy / Pontone, S.; Palma, R.; Donato, G.; Borghini, R.; Frattaroli, S.; Raniolo, M.; Panetta, C.; Lauriola, M.. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING. - ISSN 1042-895X. - 43:3(2020), pp. 258-263. [10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pontone_Efficacy-of-sedation_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 242.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
242.54 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1442301
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact