Geographic information is traditionally represented by a one-entity–one-class method, assuming that each geographical entity in the map can be unambiguously assigned to a single thematic class. Also, thematic map classes are assumed to be exhaustive and mutually exclusive. By contrast, fuzzy classifications overcome the traditional limitations on the mutually exclusive nature of map classes assigning varying levels of class membership for individual map entities. The aim of this paper is to show that the substitution of fuzzy set theory for classical set theory is an essential improvement for representing geographic information using hierarchical classification schemes.
Are landscapes as crisp as we may think? / Duccio, Rocchini; Ricotta, Carlo. - In: ECOLOGICAL MODELLING. - ISSN 0304-3800. - STAMPA. - 204:3-4(2007), pp. 535-539. [10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.028]
Are landscapes as crisp as we may think?
RICOTTA, Carlo
2007
Abstract
Geographic information is traditionally represented by a one-entity–one-class method, assuming that each geographical entity in the map can be unambiguously assigned to a single thematic class. Also, thematic map classes are assumed to be exhaustive and mutually exclusive. By contrast, fuzzy classifications overcome the traditional limitations on the mutually exclusive nature of map classes assigning varying levels of class membership for individual map entities. The aim of this paper is to show that the substitution of fuzzy set theory for classical set theory is an essential improvement for representing geographic information using hierarchical classification schemes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.