Patients with adhesive capsulitis were clinically evaluated to establish whether pain elicited by pressure on the coracoid area may be considered a pathognomonic sign of this condition. The study group included 85 patients with primary adhesive capsulitis, 465 with rotator cuff tear, 48 with calcifying tendonitis, 16 with glenohumeral arthritis, 66 with acromioclavicular arthropathy and 150 asymptomatic subjects. The test was considered positive when pain on the coracoid region was more severe than 3 points (VAS scale) with respect to the acromioclavicular joint and the anterolateral subacromial area. The test was positive in 96.4% of patients with adhesive capsulitis and in 11.1%, 14.5%, 6.2% and 10.6% of patients with the other four conditions, respectively. A positive result was obtained in 3/150 normal subjects (2%). With respect to the other four diseases, the test had a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity ranging from 0.87 to 0.89. With respect to controls, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. The coracoid pain test could be considered as a pathognomonic sign in physical examination of patients with stiff and painful shoulder.In conclusion, digital pressure over the coracoid area elicits pain in the vast majority of patients with adhesive capsulitis and, thus, it can be considered an easy and reliable clinical test for identifying patients with or without this condition. Based on its sensitivity and predictive values, it may represent a “cardinal test” for this condition.

Coracoid pain test: a new clinical sign of shoulder adhesive capsulitis / Carbone, S; Gumina, Stefano; Vestri, Anna Rita; Postacchini, R.. - In: INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. - ISSN 0341-2695. - STAMPA. - 34:(2010), pp. 385-388. [10.1007/s00264-009-0791-4]

Coracoid pain test: a new clinical sign of shoulder adhesive capsulitis

GUMINA, STEFANO;VESTRI, Anna Rita;
2010

Abstract

Patients with adhesive capsulitis were clinically evaluated to establish whether pain elicited by pressure on the coracoid area may be considered a pathognomonic sign of this condition. The study group included 85 patients with primary adhesive capsulitis, 465 with rotator cuff tear, 48 with calcifying tendonitis, 16 with glenohumeral arthritis, 66 with acromioclavicular arthropathy and 150 asymptomatic subjects. The test was considered positive when pain on the coracoid region was more severe than 3 points (VAS scale) with respect to the acromioclavicular joint and the anterolateral subacromial area. The test was positive in 96.4% of patients with adhesive capsulitis and in 11.1%, 14.5%, 6.2% and 10.6% of patients with the other four conditions, respectively. A positive result was obtained in 3/150 normal subjects (2%). With respect to the other four diseases, the test had a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity ranging from 0.87 to 0.89. With respect to controls, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. The coracoid pain test could be considered as a pathognomonic sign in physical examination of patients with stiff and painful shoulder.In conclusion, digital pressure over the coracoid area elicits pain in the vast majority of patients with adhesive capsulitis and, thus, it can be considered an easy and reliable clinical test for identifying patients with or without this condition. Based on its sensitivity and predictive values, it may represent a “cardinal test” for this condition.
2010
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Coracoid pain test: a new clinical sign of shoulder adhesive capsulitis / Carbone, S; Gumina, Stefano; Vestri, Anna Rita; Postacchini, R.. - In: INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. - ISSN 0341-2695. - STAMPA. - 34:(2010), pp. 385-388. [10.1007/s00264-009-0791-4]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/143761
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact