Introduction: We retrospectively investigated the impact of number or complete absence of nodes retrieved on survival of patients with rectal cancer (RC) treated with neoadjuvant radiation-therapy (NAT). Methods: All patients with RC treated with NAT followed by curative surgery from 2000 to 2014 in 14 Italian referral Centres for Colorectal Surgery were enrolled. Information about number of nodes harvested, node ratio, type of radiation therapy schedule and tumour stage were recorded. Impact of number or complete absence of nodes retrieved on overall survival (OS) and on cumulative incidence of death for disease (CIDD) was assessed and factors influencing node yield were investigated. Results: In total, 1407 patients were included. Mean number of nodes retrieved was 12.9, while no lymph nodes were found in only 32 patients (2%, ypNnull). Definite nodal stage was ypN0 in 1001 patients (71%) and ypN+ in 372 patients (27%). In multivariable analysis ypNnull patients showed worse OS and CIDD compared to both ypN0 and ypN+. In ypN0 patients, number of nodes assessed, stratified in 4 groups (<5, 5–10, 11–15 and > 15), did not significantly influence OS and CIDD. Long-course radiation schedule and early T stages negatively affected node assessment. Conclusion: Complete absence of nodes assessed was associated with worse prognosis compared to node-negative and node-positive patients. In node-negative patients number of nodes was not associated to OS and CIDD. Based on data from this large population of irradiated RC, number of nodes assessed has no prognostic impact in node-negative patients.

Number of lymph nodes assessed has no prognostic impact in node-negative rectal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy. Results of the “Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (S.I.C.O.) Colorectal Cancer Network” (SICO-CCN) multicentre collaborative study / Degiuli, M.; Arolfo, S.; Evangelista, A.; Lorenzon, L.; Reddavid, R.; Staudacher, C.; De Nardi, P.; Rosati, R.; Elmore, U.; Coco, C.; Rizzo, G.; Belluco, C.; Forlin, M.; Milone, M.; De Palma, G. D.; Rega, D.; Delrio, P.; Guerrieri, M.; Ortenzi, M.; Muratore, A.; Marsanic, P.; Restivo, A.; Deidda, S.; Zuin, M.; Pucciarelli, S.; De Luca, R.; Persiani, R.; Biondi, A.; Roviello, F.; Marrelli, D.; Sgroi, G.; Turati, L.; Morino, M.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0748-7983. - 44:8(2018), pp. 1233-1240. [10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.007]

Number of lymph nodes assessed has no prognostic impact in node-negative rectal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy. Results of the “Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (S.I.C.O.) Colorectal Cancer Network” (SICO-CCN) multicentre collaborative study

Lorenzon L.;
2018

Abstract

Introduction: We retrospectively investigated the impact of number or complete absence of nodes retrieved on survival of patients with rectal cancer (RC) treated with neoadjuvant radiation-therapy (NAT). Methods: All patients with RC treated with NAT followed by curative surgery from 2000 to 2014 in 14 Italian referral Centres for Colorectal Surgery were enrolled. Information about number of nodes harvested, node ratio, type of radiation therapy schedule and tumour stage were recorded. Impact of number or complete absence of nodes retrieved on overall survival (OS) and on cumulative incidence of death for disease (CIDD) was assessed and factors influencing node yield were investigated. Results: In total, 1407 patients were included. Mean number of nodes retrieved was 12.9, while no lymph nodes were found in only 32 patients (2%, ypNnull). Definite nodal stage was ypN0 in 1001 patients (71%) and ypN+ in 372 patients (27%). In multivariable analysis ypNnull patients showed worse OS and CIDD compared to both ypN0 and ypN+. In ypN0 patients, number of nodes assessed, stratified in 4 groups (<5, 5–10, 11–15 and > 15), did not significantly influence OS and CIDD. Long-course radiation schedule and early T stages negatively affected node assessment. Conclusion: Complete absence of nodes assessed was associated with worse prognosis compared to node-negative and node-positive patients. In node-negative patients number of nodes was not associated to OS and CIDD. Based on data from this large population of irradiated RC, number of nodes assessed has no prognostic impact in node-negative patients.
2018
irradiated rectal cancer; lymph node yeld; neoadjuvant radiation therapy; rectal cancer; adenocarcinoma; adolescent; adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; digestive system surgical procedures; female; follow-up studies; humans; lymph nodes; male; middle aged; neoadjuvant therapy; prognosis; rectal neoplasms; retrospective studies; young adult; neoplasm staging; societies, medical; surgical oncology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Number of lymph nodes assessed has no prognostic impact in node-negative rectal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy. Results of the “Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (S.I.C.O.) Colorectal Cancer Network” (SICO-CCN) multicentre collaborative study / Degiuli, M.; Arolfo, S.; Evangelista, A.; Lorenzon, L.; Reddavid, R.; Staudacher, C.; De Nardi, P.; Rosati, R.; Elmore, U.; Coco, C.; Rizzo, G.; Belluco, C.; Forlin, M.; Milone, M.; De Palma, G. D.; Rega, D.; Delrio, P.; Guerrieri, M.; Ortenzi, M.; Muratore, A.; Marsanic, P.; Restivo, A.; Deidda, S.; Zuin, M.; Pucciarelli, S.; De Luca, R.; Persiani, R.; Biondi, A.; Roviello, F.; Marrelli, D.; Sgroi, G.; Turati, L.; Morino, M.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0748-7983. - 44:8(2018), pp. 1233-1240. [10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.007]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Degiuli_Number_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 406.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
406.4 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1437003
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact