INTRODUCTION: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinical entity identified in 1980s, considered as an intermedi- ate stage between normal ageing and dementia, which is characterized by a cognitive decline more severe than expected in normal ageing. Although the scientific community has shown interest in MCI, the forensic implications of MCI have been poorly investigated. Forensic implications are huge, affecting all aspects of the so-called ability to act. health care professionals, and, more often, forensic experts, have to discriminate if MCI patients sufficiently perform in different actions with important legal relapses. But the question is: are there means or parameters you may use in order to decide about Mci subjects’ competence? the primary aim of the article was to describe the state of the art providing a systematic review of the scientific literature on decision-making capacity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This is the first research that provides a systematic review on the field, focusing exclusively on Mci patients. eViDeNce sYNthesis: this review highlights lack of uniformity in methods of judgment and in their interpretation about Mci competency, as well as showing the absence of papers about some key areas such as the testamentary capacity. cONcLUsiONs: Mci seems to affect deeply decision-making capacity, causing social, personal and family problems, at different levels.
Decision making in mild cognitive impairment: medicolegal implications / Rinaldi, Raffaella; Montanari Vergallo, Gianluca; Bersani, Giuseppe; Caradonna, Letizia. - In: MINERVA PSICHIATRICA. - ISSN 0391-1772. - 61:2(2020), pp. 35-36. [10.23736/S0391-1772.19.02040-5]
Decision making in mild cognitive impairment: medicolegal implications
Rinaldi, Raffaella;Montanari Vergallo, Gianluca;Bersani, Giuseppe;Caradonna, Letizia
2020
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinical entity identified in 1980s, considered as an intermedi- ate stage between normal ageing and dementia, which is characterized by a cognitive decline more severe than expected in normal ageing. Although the scientific community has shown interest in MCI, the forensic implications of MCI have been poorly investigated. Forensic implications are huge, affecting all aspects of the so-called ability to act. health care professionals, and, more often, forensic experts, have to discriminate if MCI patients sufficiently perform in different actions with important legal relapses. But the question is: are there means or parameters you may use in order to decide about Mci subjects’ competence? the primary aim of the article was to describe the state of the art providing a systematic review of the scientific literature on decision-making capacity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This is the first research that provides a systematic review on the field, focusing exclusively on Mci patients. eViDeNce sYNthesis: this review highlights lack of uniformity in methods of judgment and in their interpretation about Mci competency, as well as showing the absence of papers about some key areas such as the testamentary capacity. cONcLUsiONs: Mci seems to affect deeply decision-making capacity, causing social, personal and family problems, at different levels.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Rinaldi_Decision_2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
494.37 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
494.37 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.