Maurizio Bonolis e Lorenzo Sabetta Toward a Functional Alignment of Weber's “two ethics” In the final pages of his Politik als Beruf, Max Weber introduced his now widely known and cited distinction between two types of ethics, i.e. the seemingly dichotomous relationship between the “ethics of conviction” (gesinnungsethik) and the “ethics of responsibility” (verantwortungsethik). This proposal has provoked widespread reaction, strong endorsement and quite favorable comments as well as a significant amount of criticism. The purpose of this article, however, is exactly to avoid such hypostatized interpretations of Weber’s work, trying instead to envision a sort of functional integration of the two kinds of ethics, making the case for a blurred and nuanced reading of this famous socio-political pair of concepts. Under this light, Weber’s distinction is best understood as a differentiation between analytical models and not ontological entities – actually, the two ethics seem to be inexorably intertwined with one another, in a constant play of juxtapositions and mutual cross-references.

Verso una congiunzione funzionale delle due “etiche” weberiane / Bonolis, Maurizio; Sabetta, Lorenzo. - In: QUADERNI DI SOCIOLOGIA. - ISSN 0033-4952. - LXIII:3/2019(2019), pp. 7-26.

Verso una congiunzione funzionale delle due “etiche” weberiane

maurizio bonolis;lorenzo sabetta
2019

Abstract

Maurizio Bonolis e Lorenzo Sabetta Toward a Functional Alignment of Weber's “two ethics” In the final pages of his Politik als Beruf, Max Weber introduced his now widely known and cited distinction between two types of ethics, i.e. the seemingly dichotomous relationship between the “ethics of conviction” (gesinnungsethik) and the “ethics of responsibility” (verantwortungsethik). This proposal has provoked widespread reaction, strong endorsement and quite favorable comments as well as a significant amount of criticism. The purpose of this article, however, is exactly to avoid such hypostatized interpretations of Weber’s work, trying instead to envision a sort of functional integration of the two kinds of ethics, making the case for a blurred and nuanced reading of this famous socio-political pair of concepts. Under this light, Weber’s distinction is best understood as a differentiation between analytical models and not ontological entities – actually, the two ethics seem to be inexorably intertwined with one another, in a constant play of juxtapositions and mutual cross-references.
2019
Weber; etica della responsabilità; etica della convinzione
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Verso una congiunzione funzionale delle due “etiche” weberiane / Bonolis, Maurizio; Sabetta, Lorenzo. - In: QUADERNI DI SOCIOLOGIA. - ISSN 0033-4952. - LXIII:3/2019(2019), pp. 7-26.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bonolis_due-“etiche”-weberiane_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 100.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
100.17 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1424298
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact