Purpose: We report our experience of transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties describing our step-by-step surgical technique, and we retrospectively analyze the impact on operative times of technical modifications that were introduced during the learning curve. Patients and Methods: From November 2002 to May 2008, 84 consecutive patients with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction were selected for laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). The main steps of the surgical procedure are described. In the initial 14 patients who underwent LP, we performed intraoperative antegrade stenting, and we configured the ureteropelvic anastomosis with interrupted sutures; in the 25 following patients, anastomosis was performed with running sutures. In the latest 45 patients, the ureteral stent was positioned retrograde, and ureteropelvic anastomosis was performed with two running sutures. We evaluated the impact of technical modifications on the operative times, dividing patients into three groups (group A, first 14 patients; group B, following 25 patients; and group C, last 45 patients). Median operative times of each group were compared with the Student t test. Results: No major complications ccurred, while postoperative urinary leakage was seen in three patients at bladder catheter removal (two in group A and one in group B). Mean operative blood loss was 70mL, and mean hospital stay was 1.6 days. Median operative time was 115min (range 110-125min) for group A, 100min (range 95-115min) for group B, and 85min (range 65-95min) for group C; differences between operative times of groups A and B and between groups B and C were statistically ignificant (both P<0.001). At a median follow-up of 38 months, recurrent symptoms developed in three patients. Overall, the success rate of the procedure was 96.5%. Conclusion: In a retrospective analysis of our series, the retrograde placement of the ureteral stent and the ureteropelvic anastomosis with two running sutures seemed to be tips of success in reducing operative times. © 2009 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Retrograde placement of ureteral stent and ureteropelvic anastomosis with two running sutures in transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Tips of success in our learning curve / Rocco, Papalia; Leonardo, Costantino; Salvatore, Guaglianone; Ester, Forestiere; Maurizio, Buscarini; Gallucci, Michele. - In: JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY. - ISSN 0892-7790. - 23:5(2009), pp. 847-852. [10.1089/end.2008.0617]

Retrograde placement of ureteral stent and ureteropelvic anastomosis with two running sutures in transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Tips of success in our learning curve

LEONARDO, Costantino;Michele Gallucci
2009

Abstract

Purpose: We report our experience of transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties describing our step-by-step surgical technique, and we retrospectively analyze the impact on operative times of technical modifications that were introduced during the learning curve. Patients and Methods: From November 2002 to May 2008, 84 consecutive patients with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction were selected for laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). The main steps of the surgical procedure are described. In the initial 14 patients who underwent LP, we performed intraoperative antegrade stenting, and we configured the ureteropelvic anastomosis with interrupted sutures; in the 25 following patients, anastomosis was performed with running sutures. In the latest 45 patients, the ureteral stent was positioned retrograde, and ureteropelvic anastomosis was performed with two running sutures. We evaluated the impact of technical modifications on the operative times, dividing patients into three groups (group A, first 14 patients; group B, following 25 patients; and group C, last 45 patients). Median operative times of each group were compared with the Student t test. Results: No major complications ccurred, while postoperative urinary leakage was seen in three patients at bladder catheter removal (two in group A and one in group B). Mean operative blood loss was 70mL, and mean hospital stay was 1.6 days. Median operative time was 115min (range 110-125min) for group A, 100min (range 95-115min) for group B, and 85min (range 65-95min) for group C; differences between operative times of groups A and B and between groups B and C were statistically ignificant (both P<0.001). At a median follow-up of 38 months, recurrent symptoms developed in three patients. Overall, the success rate of the procedure was 96.5%. Conclusion: In a retrospective analysis of our series, the retrograde placement of the ureteral stent and the ureteropelvic anastomosis with two running sutures seemed to be tips of success in reducing operative times. © 2009 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2009
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Retrograde placement of ureteral stent and ureteropelvic anastomosis with two running sutures in transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Tips of success in our learning curve / Rocco, Papalia; Leonardo, Costantino; Salvatore, Guaglianone; Ester, Forestiere; Maurizio, Buscarini; Gallucci, Michele. - In: JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY. - ISSN 0892-7790. - 23:5(2009), pp. 847-852. [10.1089/end.2008.0617]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/142115
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact