Four experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship between the binding of visual features (as measured by their aftereffects on subsequent binding) and the learning of feature-conjunction probabilities. Both binding and learning effects were obtained, but they did-not interact. Interestingly, (shape-color) binding effects disappeared with increasing practice, presumably because of the fact that only I of the features involved was relevant to the task. However, this instability was only observed for arbitrary, not highly overlearned combinations of simple geometric features and not for real objects (colored pictures of a banana and strawberry), where binding effects were strong and resistant to practice. These findings suggest that learning has no direct impact on the strength or resistance of bindings or on speed with which features are bound; however, learning does affect the amount of attention particular feature dimensions attract, which again can influence which features are considered in binding.

What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration / Lorenza S., Colzato; Raffone, Antonino; Bernhard, Hommel. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE. - ISSN 0096-1523. - STAMPA. - 32:3(2006), pp. 705-716. [10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.705]

What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration

RAFFONE, Antonino;
2006

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship between the binding of visual features (as measured by their aftereffects on subsequent binding) and the learning of feature-conjunction probabilities. Both binding and learning effects were obtained, but they did-not interact. Interestingly, (shape-color) binding effects disappeared with increasing practice, presumably because of the fact that only I of the features involved was relevant to the task. However, this instability was only observed for arbitrary, not highly overlearned combinations of simple geometric features and not for real objects (colored pictures of a banana and strawberry), where binding effects were strong and resistant to practice. These findings suggest that learning has no direct impact on the strength or resistance of bindings or on speed with which features are bound; however, learning does affect the amount of attention particular feature dimensions attract, which again can influence which features are considered in binding.
2006
attentional set; binding problem; event file; feature integration; learning
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration / Lorenza S., Colzato; Raffone, Antonino; Bernhard, Hommel. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE. - ISSN 0096-1523. - STAMPA. - 32:3(2006), pp. 705-716. [10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.705]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/141947
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 33
  • Scopus 128
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 117
social impact