INTRODUCTION The latest evidence-based Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Dependence highlight the significant role of healthcare professionals in supporting smokers interested to quit. This study aimed to identify the current practices of healthcare professionals in Europe and perceived barriers in delivering tobacco treatment to their patients who smoke. METHODS In the context of EPACTT-Plus, collaborating institutions from 15 countries (Albania, Armenia, Belgium, Italy, France, Georgia, Greece, Kosovo, Romania, North Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Ukraine) worked for the development of an accredited eLearning course on Tobacco Treatment Delivery available at http:// elearning-ensp.eu/. In total, 444 healthcare professionals from the wider European region successfully completed the course from December 2018 to July 2019. Cross-sectional data were collected online on healthcare professionals’ current practices and perceived barriers in introducing tobacco-dependence treatment into their daily clinical life. RESULTS At registration, 41.2% of the participants reported having asked their patients if they smoked. Advise to quit smoking was offered by 47.1% of the participants, while 29.5% reported offering assistance to their patients who smoked in order to quit. From the total number of participants, 39.9% regarded the lack of patient compliance as a significant barrier. Other key barriers were lack of: interest from the patients (37.4%), healthcare professionals training (33.1%), community resources to refer patients (31.5%), and adequate time during their everyday clinical life (29.7%). CONCLUSIONS The identification of current practices and significant barriers is important to build evidence-based guidelines and training programs (online and/or live) that will improve the performance of healthcare professionals in offering tobacco-dependence treatment for their patients who smoke.

Current practices and perceived barriers to tobacco treatment delivery among healthcare professionals from 15 European countries. The EPACTT Plus project / Girvalaki, Charis; Mechili, Enkeleint; Papadakis, Sophia; Nikitara, Katerina; Demin, Andrei; Trofor, Antigona; Lila, Arben; Harutyunyan, Arusyak; Saliaj, Aurela; Dimitrievska, Deska; Rodriguez Lozano, Francisco; Bakhturidze, George; Ayesta, Javier; Przewoźniak, Krzysztof; Cattaruzza, Maria; Zdraveska, Marija; Lovše, Mihaela; Kilibarda, Biljana; Stoyka, Otto; Behrakis, Panagiotis; Bizel, Pierre; Starchenko, Polina; Spahija, Shkumbin; Radu-Loghin, Cornel; Vardavas, Constantine. - In: TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CESSATION (ONLINE). - ISSN 2459-3087. - 6:January(2020), pp. 1-6. [10.18332/tpc/115033]

Current practices and perceived barriers to tobacco treatment delivery among healthcare professionals from 15 European countries. The EPACTT Plus project

Cattaruzza, Maria;
2020

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The latest evidence-based Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Dependence highlight the significant role of healthcare professionals in supporting smokers interested to quit. This study aimed to identify the current practices of healthcare professionals in Europe and perceived barriers in delivering tobacco treatment to their patients who smoke. METHODS In the context of EPACTT-Plus, collaborating institutions from 15 countries (Albania, Armenia, Belgium, Italy, France, Georgia, Greece, Kosovo, Romania, North Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Ukraine) worked for the development of an accredited eLearning course on Tobacco Treatment Delivery available at http:// elearning-ensp.eu/. In total, 444 healthcare professionals from the wider European region successfully completed the course from December 2018 to July 2019. Cross-sectional data were collected online on healthcare professionals’ current practices and perceived barriers in introducing tobacco-dependence treatment into their daily clinical life. RESULTS At registration, 41.2% of the participants reported having asked their patients if they smoked. Advise to quit smoking was offered by 47.1% of the participants, while 29.5% reported offering assistance to their patients who smoked in order to quit. From the total number of participants, 39.9% regarded the lack of patient compliance as a significant barrier. Other key barriers were lack of: interest from the patients (37.4%), healthcare professionals training (33.1%), community resources to refer patients (31.5%), and adequate time during their everyday clinical life (29.7%). CONCLUSIONS The identification of current practices and significant barriers is important to build evidence-based guidelines and training programs (online and/or live) that will improve the performance of healthcare professionals in offering tobacco-dependence treatment for their patients who smoke.
2020
barriers; europe; healthcare professionals; tobacco dependence treatment; elearning; current practices
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Current practices and perceived barriers to tobacco treatment delivery among healthcare professionals from 15 European countries. The EPACTT Plus project / Girvalaki, Charis; Mechili, Enkeleint; Papadakis, Sophia; Nikitara, Katerina; Demin, Andrei; Trofor, Antigona; Lila, Arben; Harutyunyan, Arusyak; Saliaj, Aurela; Dimitrievska, Deska; Rodriguez Lozano, Francisco; Bakhturidze, George; Ayesta, Javier; Przewoźniak, Krzysztof; Cattaruzza, Maria; Zdraveska, Marija; Lovše, Mihaela; Kilibarda, Biljana; Stoyka, Otto; Behrakis, Panagiotis; Bizel, Pierre; Starchenko, Polina; Spahija, Shkumbin; Radu-Loghin, Cornel; Vardavas, Constantine. - In: TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CESSATION (ONLINE). - ISSN 2459-3087. - 6:January(2020), pp. 1-6. [10.18332/tpc/115033]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Girvalaki_Current-practises_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 114.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
114.26 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1416354
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact