Aim: The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools developed and used to assess orthorexia nervosa (ON). Methods: A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Biomed Central, and PsycINFO. The final list included 70 articles that were critically analyzed. Results: A total of six tools were reported to assess ON: the BOT, the ORTO-15, the EHQ, the DOS, the BOS, and the TOS. The tools were based upon different conceptualizations of ON and of its diagnostic criteria. Although they were different, all the conceptualizations derived from the initial definition of ON provided by Bratman in 1997. None of the methodologies adopted for tool construction considered end users or client perspectives and, when carried out, the validations of the tools were fragmented and often based on specific populations. Conclusion: This study may be a starting point for the construction of a new diagnostic tool for ON. Starting from the methodological weaknesses identified by this review, it was possible to derive some suggestions for future research: (a) developing a modern re-conceptualization of ON, comprehensive of end-user perspectives; (b) adopting qualitative data collection techniques to gain insights into how to diagnose ON; and (c) actively involving diverse stakeholders for constructing a new tool. Level of evidence: Level of Evidence: I, systematic review.

Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search / Valente, M.; Syurina, E. V.; Donini, L. M.. - In: EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS. - ISSN 1124-4909. - 24:4(2019), pp. 671-682. [10.1007/s40519-019-00735-3]

Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search

Donini L. M.
2019

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools developed and used to assess orthorexia nervosa (ON). Methods: A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Biomed Central, and PsycINFO. The final list included 70 articles that were critically analyzed. Results: A total of six tools were reported to assess ON: the BOT, the ORTO-15, the EHQ, the DOS, the BOS, and the TOS. The tools were based upon different conceptualizations of ON and of its diagnostic criteria. Although they were different, all the conceptualizations derived from the initial definition of ON provided by Bratman in 1997. None of the methodologies adopted for tool construction considered end users or client perspectives and, when carried out, the validations of the tools were fragmented and often based on specific populations. Conclusion: This study may be a starting point for the construction of a new diagnostic tool for ON. Starting from the methodological weaknesses identified by this review, it was possible to derive some suggestions for future research: (a) developing a modern re-conceptualization of ON, comprehensive of end-user perspectives; (b) adopting qualitative data collection techniques to gain insights into how to diagnose ON; and (c) actively involving diverse stakeholders for constructing a new tool. Level of evidence: Level of Evidence: I, systematic review.
2019
Assessment; Diagnosis; Eating behavior; Orthorexia nervosa; Psychometrics; Diet, Healthy; Feeding Behavior; Feeding and Eating Disorders; Humans; Psychometrics; Health Behavior
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search / Valente, M.; Syurina, E. V.; Donini, L. M.. - In: EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS. - ISSN 1124-4909. - 24:4(2019), pp. 671-682. [10.1007/s40519-019-00735-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Valente_Shedding-Light_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 821.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
821.97 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1414937
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 61
social impact