Percussive tool use holds special interest for scientists concerned with human origins. We summarize the findings from two field sites, Taï and Fazenda Boa Vista, where percussive tool use by chimpanzees and bearded capuchins, respectively, has been extensively investigated. We describe the ecological settings in which nut-cracking occurs and focus on four aspects of nut-cracking that have important cognitive implications, namely selection of tools, tool transport, tool modification and modulation of actions to reach the goal of cracking the nut. We comment on similarities and differences in behaviour and consider whether the observed differences reflect ecological, morphological, social and/or cognitive factors. Both species are sensitive to physical properties of tools, adjust their selection of hammers conditionally to the resistance of the nuts and to transport distance, and modulate the energy of their strikes under some conditions. However, chimpanzees transport hammers more frequently and for longer distances, take into account a higher number of combinations of variables and occasionally intentionally modify tools. A parsimonious interpretation of our findings is that morphological, ecological and social factors account for the observed differences. Confirmation of plausible cognitive differences in nut-cracking requires data not yet available.

Percussive tool use by Taï western chimpanzees and fazenda boa vista bearded capuchin monkeys. A comparison / Visalberghi, E.; Sirianni, G.; Fragaszy, D.; Boesch, C.. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS - ROYAL SOCIETY. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0962-8436. - 370:1682(2015). [10.1098/rstb.2014.0351]

Percussive tool use by Taï western chimpanzees and fazenda boa vista bearded capuchin monkeys. A comparison

Visalberghi E.
;
Sirianni G.;
2015

Abstract

Percussive tool use holds special interest for scientists concerned with human origins. We summarize the findings from two field sites, Taï and Fazenda Boa Vista, where percussive tool use by chimpanzees and bearded capuchins, respectively, has been extensively investigated. We describe the ecological settings in which nut-cracking occurs and focus on four aspects of nut-cracking that have important cognitive implications, namely selection of tools, tool transport, tool modification and modulation of actions to reach the goal of cracking the nut. We comment on similarities and differences in behaviour and consider whether the observed differences reflect ecological, morphological, social and/or cognitive factors. Both species are sensitive to physical properties of tools, adjust their selection of hammers conditionally to the resistance of the nuts and to transport distance, and modulate the energy of their strikes under some conditions. However, chimpanzees transport hammers more frequently and for longer distances, take into account a higher number of combinations of variables and occasionally intentionally modify tools. A parsimonious interpretation of our findings is that morphological, ecological and social factors account for the observed differences. Confirmation of plausible cognitive differences in nut-cracking requires data not yet available.
2015
kinematics; percussive tool use; tool modification; tool selection; tool transport; animals; biological evolution; body size; cebus; ecosystem; feeding behavior; humans; motor skills; nuts; pan troglodytes; species specificity; tool use behavior
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Percussive tool use by Taï western chimpanzees and fazenda boa vista bearded capuchin monkeys. A comparison / Visalberghi, E.; Sirianni, G.; Fragaszy, D.; Boesch, C.. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS - ROYAL SOCIETY. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0962-8436. - 370:1682(2015). [10.1098/rstb.2014.0351]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Visalberghi_Percussive_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 619.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
619.21 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1411912
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact