Evaluating object segmentation is a topic of great interest for shape comparison techniques. In this work, ad-hoc metrics for a detailed segmentation analysis and a novel keypoint based method for comparing pairs of shapes are presented. As references, two different segmentation approaches were used: a handmade segmentation and an automatic one based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The proposed comparison approach consists of a combination between a keypoint extractor and an invariant scale shape identifier. The overall validation process is established according to different steps, which allow to measure the similarity between shapes. First, Reinforced Matched (RM) and Reinforced Ratio (RR) strategies are implemented. Moreover, five different state-of-the-art keypoint extractors are compared, i.e., SIFT, SURF, ORB, A-KAZE, and BRISK. Experimental tests were performed on a popular collection of images, i.e., the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset and Benchmark 300 (BSDS300), which contains shapes segmented both manually and automatically. The experimental results have shown the effectiveness of the proposed method.

A shape comparison reinforcement method based on feature extractors and F1-Score / Avola, D; Cinque, L; Foresti, Gl; Lamacchia, F; Marini, Mr; Perini, L; Qorraj, K; Telesca, G. - (2019), pp. 2155-2159. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) tenutosi a Bari; Italia).

A shape comparison reinforcement method based on feature extractors and F1-Score

Avola, D;Cinque, L;Marini, MR;Qorraj, K;Telesca, G
2019

Abstract

Evaluating object segmentation is a topic of great interest for shape comparison techniques. In this work, ad-hoc metrics for a detailed segmentation analysis and a novel keypoint based method for comparing pairs of shapes are presented. As references, two different segmentation approaches were used: a handmade segmentation and an automatic one based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The proposed comparison approach consists of a combination between a keypoint extractor and an invariant scale shape identifier. The overall validation process is established according to different steps, which allow to measure the similarity between shapes. First, Reinforced Matched (RM) and Reinforced Ratio (RR) strategies are implemented. Moreover, five different state-of-the-art keypoint extractors are compared, i.e., SIFT, SURF, ORB, A-KAZE, and BRISK. Experimental tests were performed on a popular collection of images, i.e., the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset and Benchmark 300 (BSDS300), which contains shapes segmented both manually and automatically. The experimental results have shown the effectiveness of the proposed method.
2019
2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC)
shape comparison reinforcement method; feature extractors; object segmentation; ad-hoc metrics; handmade segmentation; keypoint extractor; invariant scale shape identifier; F1-score; segmentation analysis; keypoint based method; convolutional neural network; reinforced matched; reinforced ratio; keypoint extractors
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
A shape comparison reinforcement method based on feature extractors and F1-Score / Avola, D; Cinque, L; Foresti, Gl; Lamacchia, F; Marini, Mr; Perini, L; Qorraj, K; Telesca, G. - (2019), pp. 2155-2159. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) tenutosi a Bari; Italia).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Marini_F1-Score_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 204.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
204.42 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1411203
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact