This paper aims to compare the adsorption performance of activated carbon and pine bark for iron and manganese removal from contaminated groundwater. Moreover, their environmental compatibility was checked for their possible use as reactive media in a permeable reactive barrier for in situ remediation. Batch tests were carried out with different iron and manganese concentrations and different particle-size distributions, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the activated carbon and pine bark on removal depending on both the initial pollutant concentration and the surface area of the adsorbent. High removal efficiencies were reached by both of the reactive media. However, faster removal at higher concentration was observed only for iron adsorption by activated carbon. The particle-size distribution did not significantly influence the process in the experimental conditions tested. The immobilization process on the reactive media can be considered almost irreversible since the quantities of iron and manganese released during the desorption tests were negligible.

Fe(II) and Mn(II) removal from contaminated groundwater by adsorption. A comparison of activated carbon and pine bark / Sbaffoni, S.; Boni, M. R.; Tedesco, P.; Vaccari, M.. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. - ISSN 1582-9596. - 17:8(2018), pp. 1989-1999. [10.30638/EEMJ.2018.198]

Fe(II) and Mn(II) removal from contaminated groundwater by adsorption. A comparison of activated carbon and pine bark

Sbaffoni S.
Primo
;
Boni M. R.
Secondo
;
Tedesco P.
Penultimo
;
Vaccari M.
Ultimo
2018

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the adsorption performance of activated carbon and pine bark for iron and manganese removal from contaminated groundwater. Moreover, their environmental compatibility was checked for their possible use as reactive media in a permeable reactive barrier for in situ remediation. Batch tests were carried out with different iron and manganese concentrations and different particle-size distributions, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the activated carbon and pine bark on removal depending on both the initial pollutant concentration and the surface area of the adsorbent. High removal efficiencies were reached by both of the reactive media. However, faster removal at higher concentration was observed only for iron adsorption by activated carbon. The particle-size distribution did not significantly influence the process in the experimental conditions tested. The immobilization process on the reactive media can be considered almost irreversible since the quantities of iron and manganese released during the desorption tests were negligible.
2018
adsorption; biosorbents; contaminated groundwater; heavy metals
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Fe(II) and Mn(II) removal from contaminated groundwater by adsorption. A comparison of activated carbon and pine bark / Sbaffoni, S.; Boni, M. R.; Tedesco, P.; Vaccari, M.. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. - ISSN 1582-9596. - 17:8(2018), pp. 1989-1999. [10.30638/EEMJ.2018.198]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Sbaffoni_Fe(ii)-and-mn(ii)-removal_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 120.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
120.6 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1409417
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact