The chemical analysis of cannabis potency involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of the main phytocannabinoids: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), etc. Although it might appear as a trivial analysis, it is rather a tricky task. Phytocannabinoids are present mostly as carboxylated species at the aromatic ring of the resorcinyl moiety. Their decarboxylation caused by heat leads to a greater analytical variability due to both reaction kinetics and possible decomposition. Moreover, the instability of cannabinoids and the variability in the sample preparation, extraction, and analysis, as well as the presence of isomeric forms of cannabinoids, complicates the scenario. A critical evaluation of the different analytical methods proposed in the literature points out that each of them has inherent limitations. The present review outlines all the possible pitfalls that can be encountered during the analysis of these compounds and aims to be a valuable help for the analytical chemist. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Pitfalls in the analysis of phytocannabinoids in cannabis inflorescence / Citti, C.; Russo, F.; Sgro, S.; Gallo, A.; Zanotto, A.; Forni, F.; Vandelli, M. A.; Lagana, A.; Montone, CARMELA MARIA; Gigli, G.; Cannazza, G.. - In: ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 1618-2642. - (2020), pp. 4009-4022. [10.1007/s00216-020-02554-3]

Pitfalls in the analysis of phytocannabinoids in cannabis inflorescence

Forni F.;Lagana A.;Montone Carmela Maria;
2020

Abstract

The chemical analysis of cannabis potency involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of the main phytocannabinoids: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), etc. Although it might appear as a trivial analysis, it is rather a tricky task. Phytocannabinoids are present mostly as carboxylated species at the aromatic ring of the resorcinyl moiety. Their decarboxylation caused by heat leads to a greater analytical variability due to both reaction kinetics and possible decomposition. Moreover, the instability of cannabinoids and the variability in the sample preparation, extraction, and analysis, as well as the presence of isomeric forms of cannabinoids, complicates the scenario. A critical evaluation of the different analytical methods proposed in the literature points out that each of them has inherent limitations. The present review outlines all the possible pitfalls that can be encountered during the analysis of these compounds and aims to be a valuable help for the analytical chemist. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
2020
cannabinoid analysis; cannabinoid extraction; cannabis flos monograph; GC-FID; LC-UV; mass spectrometry
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Pitfalls in the analysis of phytocannabinoids in cannabis inflorescence / Citti, C.; Russo, F.; Sgro, S.; Gallo, A.; Zanotto, A.; Forni, F.; Vandelli, M. A.; Lagana, A.; Montone, CARMELA MARIA; Gigli, G.; Cannazza, G.. - In: ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 1618-2642. - (2020), pp. 4009-4022. [10.1007/s00216-020-02554-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Citti_PitfallsIn_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: full paper online
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 654.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
654.49 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1409332
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
social impact