The contribution deals with the evidence for ashlar masonry from Ebla (modern Tell Mardikh), in north inner Syria. The city first flourished between 2500 and 2300 BC, the ‘first Ebla’, in the early and mature Early Syrian period (EBA IVA). In 2300 BC it was destroyed by Sargon of Akkad, or as a consequence of this king’s deeds in Northern Syria. Ebla was almost immediately reconstructed and enjoyed a second period of relative prosperity, the ‘second Ebla’, in the late Early Syrian period (EBA IVB). This is documented by several texts from the Ur III Dynasty which mention men from Ebla travelling to Ur to trade in precious textiles and decorated furniture (Owen 1992), and from Gudea’s Statue B which mentions wood brought from the region of Ebla in order to build Ningirsu’s Temple in Lagash. The second Ebla was also destroyed, around 2000 BC , a period when the Amorites became dominant in Syria and Mesopotamia and seized important centers, such as Ebla and Babylon. However, even after this fierce destruction, the town was not left abandoned for long: archaeological evidence shows that new settlers were soon active again, giving birth to the ‘third Ebla’ of the early and mature Old Syrian period (MBA I-II). It was finally destroyed around 1600 BC, probably by the Hittite king Murshilish I or his ally Pizikarra of Nineveh.

Building in stone and mudbrick. The monumental architecture of Ebla in Middle Bronze Age I-II / Pinnock, F.. - (2020), pp. 97-120. (Intervento presentato al convegno Ashlar. Exploring the materiality of cut-stone masonry in the Eastern Mediterranean Bronze Age tenutosi a Louvain-la-Neuve).

Building in stone and mudbrick. The monumental architecture of Ebla in Middle Bronze Age I-II

F. Pinnock
2020

Abstract

The contribution deals with the evidence for ashlar masonry from Ebla (modern Tell Mardikh), in north inner Syria. The city first flourished between 2500 and 2300 BC, the ‘first Ebla’, in the early and mature Early Syrian period (EBA IVA). In 2300 BC it was destroyed by Sargon of Akkad, or as a consequence of this king’s deeds in Northern Syria. Ebla was almost immediately reconstructed and enjoyed a second period of relative prosperity, the ‘second Ebla’, in the late Early Syrian period (EBA IVB). This is documented by several texts from the Ur III Dynasty which mention men from Ebla travelling to Ur to trade in precious textiles and decorated furniture (Owen 1992), and from Gudea’s Statue B which mentions wood brought from the region of Ebla in order to build Ningirsu’s Temple in Lagash. The second Ebla was also destroyed, around 2000 BC , a period when the Amorites became dominant in Syria and Mesopotamia and seized important centers, such as Ebla and Babylon. However, even after this fierce destruction, the town was not left abandoned for long: archaeological evidence shows that new settlers were soon active again, giving birth to the ‘third Ebla’ of the early and mature Old Syrian period (MBA I-II). It was finally destroyed around 1600 BC, probably by the Hittite king Murshilish I or his ally Pizikarra of Nineveh.
2020
Ashlar. Exploring the materiality of cut-stone masonry in the Eastern Mediterranean Bronze Age
Ebla; bronzo medio; uso della pietra
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Building in stone and mudbrick. The monumental architecture of Ebla in Middle Bronze Age I-II / Pinnock, F.. - (2020), pp. 97-120. (Intervento presentato al convegno Ashlar. Exploring the materiality of cut-stone masonry in the Eastern Mediterranean Bronze Age tenutosi a Louvain-la-Neuve).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pinnock_Building_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.22 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1407492
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact