Background: Many studies show that a low level of health literacy (HL) is associated with several adverse outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to estimate the prevalence of nonadequate HL (NAHL) in European countries and outline the main needs for interventions. Methods: The systematic search was performed in April 2019 and updated in June 2019. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched. Articles were considered eligible if they were cross-sectional studies published in English after 2000 and estimating the NAHL prevalence in European countries. Globally, 15490 articles were retrieved. Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied for the quality assessment. Several stratified metaanalyses were carried out. We also performed a metaregression analysis to test the association between variables and NAHL. Results: In total, 59 articles of heterogeneous quality were included, providing data for 98 studies to include in the proportion meta-analysis. Overall, quantitative analysis yielded a pooled NAHL prevalence of 40% (95%CI, 36%-43%). Despite the prevalence varied considerably by country, it seemed to follow a geographic gradient, with the northern countries clearly having a lower prevalence than the other European counterparts. The pooled prevalence estimates (PEs) varied significantly according to the different type of HL assessment method applied. Also, high study quality was found to be significantly associated with a reduction of NAHL in the PEs. Grouping the sample in general population, oncology patients, chronic disease patients and refugees, the meta-regression analysis showed a significantly lower prevalence of NAHL in oncology patients. Conclusions: Although the PEs varied in relation to several factors (e.g. either among population groups, or depending on the HL assessment method), this study shows that more than one in every three surveyed participants had NAHL. Targeted strategies and coordinated policies aiming at improving HL in the Region are needed.
Prevalence of non-adequate health literacy in Europe. A systematic review and meta-analysis / Baccolini, Valentina; DI PAOLO, Carolina; Salerno, Carla; Rosso, Annalisa; Prencipe, GRAZIA PIA; Isonne, Claudia; Marzuillo, Carolina; DE VITO, Corrado; Villari, Paolo; Romano, Ferdinando. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1101-1262. - 29:Suppl. 4(2019), pp. 103-103. (Intervento presentato al convegno 12th European Public Health Conference. Building bridges for solidarity and public health tenutosi a Marseille; France) [10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.271].
Prevalence of non-adequate health literacy in Europe. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Valentina Baccolini
Primo
;Carolina Di Paolo;Carla Salerno;Annalisa Rosso;Grazia Pia Prencipe;Claudia Isonne;Carolina Marzuillo;Corrado De Vito;Paolo Villari;Ferdinando Romano
2019
Abstract
Background: Many studies show that a low level of health literacy (HL) is associated with several adverse outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to estimate the prevalence of nonadequate HL (NAHL) in European countries and outline the main needs for interventions. Methods: The systematic search was performed in April 2019 and updated in June 2019. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched. Articles were considered eligible if they were cross-sectional studies published in English after 2000 and estimating the NAHL prevalence in European countries. Globally, 15490 articles were retrieved. Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied for the quality assessment. Several stratified metaanalyses were carried out. We also performed a metaregression analysis to test the association between variables and NAHL. Results: In total, 59 articles of heterogeneous quality were included, providing data for 98 studies to include in the proportion meta-analysis. Overall, quantitative analysis yielded a pooled NAHL prevalence of 40% (95%CI, 36%-43%). Despite the prevalence varied considerably by country, it seemed to follow a geographic gradient, with the northern countries clearly having a lower prevalence than the other European counterparts. The pooled prevalence estimates (PEs) varied significantly according to the different type of HL assessment method applied. Also, high study quality was found to be significantly associated with a reduction of NAHL in the PEs. Grouping the sample in general population, oncology patients, chronic disease patients and refugees, the meta-regression analysis showed a significantly lower prevalence of NAHL in oncology patients. Conclusions: Although the PEs varied in relation to several factors (e.g. either among population groups, or depending on the HL assessment method), this study shows that more than one in every three surveyed participants had NAHL. Targeted strategies and coordinated policies aiming at improving HL in the Region are needed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Baccolini_Prevalence_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
76.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
76.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.