Birks et al. question our proposition that trees survived the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) in Northern Scandinavia. We dispute their interpretation of our modern genetic data but agree that more work is required. Our field and laboratory procedures were robust; contamination is an unlikely explanation of our results. Their description of Endletvatn as ice-covered and inundated during the LGM is inconsistent with recent geological literature.
Response to comment on "Glacial Survival of Boreal Trees in Northern Scandinavia" / Parducci, L.; Edwards, M. E.; Bennett, K. D.; Alm, T.; Elverland, E.; Tollefsrud, M. M.; Jorgensen, T.; Houmark-Nielsen, M.; Larsen, N. K.; Kjaer, K. H.; Fontana, S. L.; Alsos, I. G.; Willerslev, E.. - In: SCIENCE. - ISSN 0036-8075. - 338:6108(2012), pp. 742-742. [10.1126/science.1225476]
Response to comment on "Glacial Survival of Boreal Trees in Northern Scandinavia"
Parducci, L.
Primo
Conceptualization
;
2012
Abstract
Birks et al. question our proposition that trees survived the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) in Northern Scandinavia. We dispute their interpretation of our modern genetic data but agree that more work is required. Our field and laboratory procedures were robust; contamination is an unlikely explanation of our results. Their description of Endletvatn as ice-covered and inundated during the LGM is inconsistent with recent geological literature.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Parducci_Response-to-comment_2012.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
362.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
362.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.