Corte costituzionale, riforme e statuti regionali: dall’inefficacia giuridica delle norme programmatiche al superamento dell’ambigua distinzione tra contenuto “necessario” e contenuto “eventuale”

The delimitation of the competence-laws made ​​by the Court through the substantial need to overcome the dichotomy between content and content is possible, therefore, despite the absence of a declaration of unconstitutionality of the statutory provisions programmatic, the significant conclusion reached by the three judgments. The fact that the political autonomy of the regions has been, at least in intention, greatly enhanced by the design of the reform of Title V of Part II of the Constitution imposed, moreover, a delimitation of the competence of the regional sources more clearly than in the past and declared by the exorbitant power of the statutory provisions of substantive reports on incidents apparently clashes with the recognition of wider political autonomy to institutions of local exponential.