The present study investigates the types of verb and symbolic representational strategies used by 10 deaf signing adults and 13 deaf signing children who described in Italian Sign Language 45 video clips representing nine action types generally communicated by five general verbs in spoken Italian. General verbs, in which the same sign was produced to refer to several different physical action types, were rarely used by either group of participants. Both signing children and adults usually produced specific depicting predicates by incorporating, through a representational strategy, the object and/or the modality of the action into the sign. As for the different types of representational strategies, the adults used the hand-as-object strategy more frequently than the children, who, in turn, preferred to use the hand-as-hand strategy, suggesting that different degrees of cognitive complexity are involved in these two symbolic strategies. Addressing the symbolic iconic strategies underlying sign formation could provide new insight into the perceptual and cognitive processes of linguistic meaning construction. The findings reported here support two main assumptions of cognitive linguistics applied to sign languages: there is a strong continuity between gestures and language; lexical units and depicting constructions derive from the same iconic core mechanism of sign creation.
The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS) / Tomasuolo, Elena; Bonsignori, Chiara; Rinaldi, Pasquale; Volterra, Virginia. - In: COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS. - ISSN 1613-3641. - 31:1(2020), pp. 1-45.
|Titolo:||The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS)|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2020|
|Citazione:||The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS) / Tomasuolo, Elena; Bonsignori, Chiara; Rinaldi, Pasquale; Volterra, Virginia. - In: COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS. - ISSN 1613-3641. - 31:1(2020), pp. 1-45.|
|Appartiene alla tipologia:||01a Articolo in rivista|
File allegati a questo prodotto
|Bonsignori_Representation-action-Italian_2020.pdf||https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0131||Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)||Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)||Open Access Visualizza/Apri|