As certified by Eurostat, in 2015 Italy was among the European countries with the most pronounced income inequality, with a “20:20 ratio” of 5.8. That is, the income share of the richest 20% of households is 5.8 times that of the poorest 20%. Only Serbia, Romania, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Spain, Greece, Latvia, Estonia e Portugal displayed a higher inequality ratio that year. Even in the broader group of all OECD countries, including the US and the UK, Italy is among the most unequal. The main difference between Italy and the US or Britain is that in Italy inequality had gradually decreased through the 1980s, scoring a minimum in 1991, before then rising dramatically (Fiorio, 2011; Brandolini and Smeeding, 2008). In the US and the UK, by contrast, inequality has increased steadily. The social costs of income inequality can be substantially aggravated or mitigated by a country’s welfare system, so it is important to analyze the structures that the various nations have adopted. The main differences concern both amount of expenditure and the form in which benefits are delivered. For Italy, between 2000 and 2008 the bulk of social expenditure went for old age pensions (59.1% compared with an average of 43.7% in Europe). The article examines trends in inequality in Italy from 1987 to 2014 and analyzes the changing distribution of individual incomes by source (payroll employment, self-employment, pension) and by geographical area.

Pensions and the Dynamics of Inequality in Italy: Initial Evidence, 1987-2014 / Arezzo, M. F.; Strangio, D.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN ECONOMIC HISTORY. - ISSN 0391-5115. - 1:XLVIII(2019), pp. 31-45.

Pensions and the Dynamics of Inequality in Italy: Initial Evidence, 1987-2014

M. F. AREZZO;D. STRANGIO
2019

Abstract

As certified by Eurostat, in 2015 Italy was among the European countries with the most pronounced income inequality, with a “20:20 ratio” of 5.8. That is, the income share of the richest 20% of households is 5.8 times that of the poorest 20%. Only Serbia, Romania, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Spain, Greece, Latvia, Estonia e Portugal displayed a higher inequality ratio that year. Even in the broader group of all OECD countries, including the US and the UK, Italy is among the most unequal. The main difference between Italy and the US or Britain is that in Italy inequality had gradually decreased through the 1980s, scoring a minimum in 1991, before then rising dramatically (Fiorio, 2011; Brandolini and Smeeding, 2008). In the US and the UK, by contrast, inequality has increased steadily. The social costs of income inequality can be substantially aggravated or mitigated by a country’s welfare system, so it is important to analyze the structures that the various nations have adopted. The main differences concern both amount of expenditure and the form in which benefits are delivered. For Italy, between 2000 and 2008 the bulk of social expenditure went for old age pensions (59.1% compared with an average of 43.7% in Europe). The article examines trends in inequality in Italy from 1987 to 2014 and analyzes the changing distribution of individual incomes by source (payroll employment, self-employment, pension) and by geographical area.
2019
Debt; Public Finance; State Intervention; Welfare State; nequality; Pnsions; Italy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Pensions and the Dynamics of Inequality in Italy: Initial Evidence, 1987-2014 / Arezzo, M. F.; Strangio, D.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN ECONOMIC HISTORY. - ISSN 0391-5115. - 1:XLVIII(2019), pp. 31-45.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Strangio_Copertina-The Journal_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 555.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
555.72 kB Adobe PDF
Strangio_Pensions_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 377.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
377.14 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1375179
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact