Aim: to evaluate efficacy and late toxicity of moderate hypofractionated (HFRT) over high-dose (>76 Gy) conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in a non-inferiority perspective. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. HFRT regimens were deemed non-inferior to high-dose CRT if the computed CI for the overall RR did not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 7%. Results: When the prespecified margin, corresponding to a critical RR of 0.930 for CCS, OS and BFS, was used all efficacy outcomes satisfied the criteria for the non-inferiority analysis indicating the non-inferiority of HFRT regimens over high-dose CRT in the medium term period. Differently, the evidence concerning the late toxicity was inconclusive. Conclusions: Noninferiority analysis indicates that moderate HFRT regimes are non-inferior over high-dose CRT in the medium-term. Inconclusive is the evidence for the late toxicity. Longer follow-up will provide a more clear answer concerning the non-inferiority of HFRT regimens in the long-term period.
Are we ready for a paradigm shift from high-dose conventional to moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in intermediate-high risk prostate cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis / Ferella, L., Limoncin, E., Vittorini, F., Chalaszczyk, A., Sorce, C., Grimaldi, G., Franzese, P., Ruggieri, V., Varrassi, E., Di Staso, M., Gimenez De Lorenzo, R., Marampon, F., Tombolini, V., Masciocchi, C., Gravina, G.L.. - In: CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1040-8428. - 139:(2019), pp. 75-82. [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.04.012]
Are we ready for a paradigm shift from high-dose conventional to moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in intermediate-high risk prostate cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
Limoncin E.;Grimaldi G.;Marampon F.;Tombolini V.;
2019
Abstract
Aim: to evaluate efficacy and late toxicity of moderate hypofractionated (HFRT) over high-dose (>76 Gy) conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in a non-inferiority perspective. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. HFRT regimens were deemed non-inferior to high-dose CRT if the computed CI for the overall RR did not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 7%. Results: When the prespecified margin, corresponding to a critical RR of 0.930 for CCS, OS and BFS, was used all efficacy outcomes satisfied the criteria for the non-inferiority analysis indicating the non-inferiority of HFRT regimens over high-dose CRT in the medium term period. Differently, the evidence concerning the late toxicity was inconclusive. Conclusions: Noninferiority analysis indicates that moderate HFRT regimes are non-inferior over high-dose CRT in the medium-term. Inconclusive is the evidence for the late toxicity. Longer follow-up will provide a more clear answer concerning the non-inferiority of HFRT regimens in the long-term period.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ferella_Ready-for-a-paradigm_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
2.35 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.35 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


