Objects Matching is a ubiquitous problem in computer science with particular relevance for many applications; property transfer between 3D models and statistical study for learning are just some remarkable examples. The research community spent a lot of effort to address this problem, and a large and increased set of innovative methods has been proposed for its solution. In order to provide a fair comparison among these methods, different benchmarks have been proposed. However, all these benchmarks are domain specific, e.g., real scans coming from the same acquisition pipeline, or synthetic watertight meshes with the same triangulation. To the best of our knowledge, no cross-dataset comparisons have been proposed to date. This track provides the first matching evaluation in terms of large connectivity changes between models that come from totally different modeling methods. We provide a dataset of 44 shapes with dense correspondence as obtained by a highly accurate shape registration method (FARM). Our evaluation proves that connectivity changes lead to Objects Matching difficulties and we hope this will promote further research in matching shapes with wildly different connectivity.

SHREC’19: matching humans with different connectivity / Melzi, S.; Marin, R.; Rodolà, E.; Castellani, U.; Ren, J.; Poulenard, A.; Wonka, ; P., and Ovsjanikov. - (2019), pp. 1-8. (Intervento presentato al convegno 3DOR 19: the 12th Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval tenutosi a Genova; Italy) [10.2312/3dor.20191070].

SHREC’19: matching humans with different connectivity

Melzi, S.;Marin, R.;Rodolà, E.;
2019

Abstract

Objects Matching is a ubiquitous problem in computer science with particular relevance for many applications; property transfer between 3D models and statistical study for learning are just some remarkable examples. The research community spent a lot of effort to address this problem, and a large and increased set of innovative methods has been proposed for its solution. In order to provide a fair comparison among these methods, different benchmarks have been proposed. However, all these benchmarks are domain specific, e.g., real scans coming from the same acquisition pipeline, or synthetic watertight meshes with the same triangulation. To the best of our knowledge, no cross-dataset comparisons have been proposed to date. This track provides the first matching evaluation in terms of large connectivity changes between models that come from totally different modeling methods. We provide a dataset of 44 shapes with dense correspondence as obtained by a highly accurate shape registration method (FARM). Our evaluation proves that connectivity changes lead to Objects Matching difficulties and we hope this will promote further research in matching shapes with wildly different connectivity.
2019
3DOR 19: the 12th Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval
objects matching; shape registration method; different connectivity
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
SHREC’19: matching humans with different connectivity / Melzi, S.; Marin, R.; Rodolà, E.; Castellani, U.; Ren, J.; Poulenard, A.; Wonka, ; P., and Ovsjanikov. - (2019), pp. 1-8. (Intervento presentato al convegno 3DOR 19: the 12th Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval tenutosi a Genova; Italy) [10.2312/3dor.20191070].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Melzi_SHREC_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 17.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
17.96 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1360130
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact