Texture analysis versus conventional MRI prognostic factors in predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix

Introduction: To determine the performance of texture analysis and conventional MRI parameters in predicting tumoral response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to assess whether a relationship exists between texture tissue heterogeneity and histological type of uterine cervix cancer. Method and materials: Twenty-eight patients with local advanced cervical cancer (FIGO IB2-IIIB), underwent MRI before chemotherapy. Texture analysis parameters were quantified on T2-weighted sequences, as well as the maximum diameter expressed in mm. ADC values were obtained on the ADC map. Statistical analysis included unpaired t test and ROC curve. Results: No statistical correlation was found between conventional parameters and response to NACT. Mean and skewness showed a strong correlation with the histological type: Adenocarcinomas presented higher mean and skewness values (69.8 ± 10.5 and 0.55 ± 0.19) in comparison with squamous cell carcinomas. Using a cutoff value ≥ 29 for mean it was possible to differentiate the two histological types with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81%. Kurtosis showed a positive correlation with tumor response to NACT resulting higher in responders (v.m. 5.7 ± 1.1) in comparison with non-responders (2.3 ± 0.5). The optimal Kurtosis cutoff value for the identification of non-responders tumors was ≤ 3.7 with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 75%. Conclusion: Texture analysis applied to T2-weighted images of uterine cervical cancer exceeded the role of conventional prognostic factors in predicting tumoral response; moreover, they showed a potential role to differentiate histological tumor types.