We manage decisions under “objective” ambiguity by considering generalized Anscombe-Aumann acts, mapping states of the world to generalized lotteries on a set of consequences. A generalized lottery is modeled through a belief function on consequences, interpreted as a partially specified randomizing device. Preference relations on these acts are given by a decision maker focusing on different scenarios (conditioning events). We provide a system of axioms which are necessary and sufficient for the representability of these “conditional preferences” through a conditional functional parametrized by a unique full conditional probability P on the algebra of events and a cardinal utility function u on consequences. The model is able to manage also “unexpected” (i.e., “null”) conditioning events and distinguishes between a systematically pessimistic or optimistic behavior, either referring to “objective” belief functions or their dual plausibility functions. Finally, an elicitation procedure is provided, reducing to a Quadratically Constrained Linear Program (QCLP).
Modeling agent's conditional preferences under objective ambiguity in Dempster-Shafer theory / Petturiti, D.; Vantaggi, B.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING. - ISSN 0888-613X. - 119:(2020), pp. 151-176. [10.1016/j.ijar.2019.12.019]
Modeling agent's conditional preferences under objective ambiguity in Dempster-Shafer theory
Vantaggi B.
2020
Abstract
We manage decisions under “objective” ambiguity by considering generalized Anscombe-Aumann acts, mapping states of the world to generalized lotteries on a set of consequences. A generalized lottery is modeled through a belief function on consequences, interpreted as a partially specified randomizing device. Preference relations on these acts are given by a decision maker focusing on different scenarios (conditioning events). We provide a system of axioms which are necessary and sufficient for the representability of these “conditional preferences” through a conditional functional parametrized by a unique full conditional probability P on the algebra of events and a cardinal utility function u on consequences. The model is able to manage also “unexpected” (i.e., “null”) conditioning events and distinguishes between a systematically pessimistic or optimistic behavior, either referring to “objective” belief functions or their dual plausibility functions. Finally, an elicitation procedure is provided, reducing to a Quadratically Constrained Linear Program (QCLP).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Vantaggi_Modeling-agent's_2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
593.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
593.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.