Insanity definition and the threshold for satisfying its legal criteria tend to vary depending on the jurisdictions. Yet, in Western countries, the legal standards for insanity often rely on the presence of cognitive and/or volitional impairment of the defendant at crime time. Despite some efforts having been made to guide and structure criminal responsibility evaluations, a valid instrument that could be useful to guide forensic psychiatrists’ criminal responsibility assessments in different jurisdictions is lacking. This is a gap that needs to be addressed, considering the significant forensic and procedural implications of psychiatric evaluations. In addition, differences in methodology used in insanity assessments may also have consequences for the principle of equal rights for all citizens before the law, which should be guaranteed in the European Union. We developed an instrument, the Defendant’s Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS), which can be useful to support, structure, and guide the insanity assessment across different jurisdictions, in order to improve reliability and consistency of such evaluations.

Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant’s Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS) / Parmigiani, G.; Mandarelli, G.; Meynen, G.; Carabellese, F.; Ferracuti, S.. - In: TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 2158-3188. - 9:1(2019). [10.1038/s41398-019-0628-x]

Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant’s Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS)

Parmigiani G.
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Mandarelli G.
Secondo
Methodology
;
Meynen G.
Penultimo
Methodology
;
Ferracuti S.
Ultimo
Conceptualization
2019

Abstract

Insanity definition and the threshold for satisfying its legal criteria tend to vary depending on the jurisdictions. Yet, in Western countries, the legal standards for insanity often rely on the presence of cognitive and/or volitional impairment of the defendant at crime time. Despite some efforts having been made to guide and structure criminal responsibility evaluations, a valid instrument that could be useful to guide forensic psychiatrists’ criminal responsibility assessments in different jurisdictions is lacking. This is a gap that needs to be addressed, considering the significant forensic and procedural implications of psychiatric evaluations. In addition, differences in methodology used in insanity assessments may also have consequences for the principle of equal rights for all citizens before the law, which should be guaranteed in the European Union. We developed an instrument, the Defendant’s Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS), which can be useful to support, structure, and guide the insanity assessment across different jurisdictions, in order to improve reliability and consistency of such evaluations.
2019
Insanity defence; mental illness; evaluation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant’s Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS) / Parmigiani, G.; Mandarelli, G.; Meynen, G.; Carabellese, F.; Ferracuti, S.. - In: TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 2158-3188. - 9:1(2019). [10.1038/s41398-019-0628-x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Parmigiani_translating_diass_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 441.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
441.84 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1351460
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact