Objective:To investigate interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between the facial primary motor cortices(fM1s).Methods:IHI was investigated in 10 healthy subjects using paired-pulse TMS in the depressor anguli oris(DAO), upper trapezius (UT) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. Conditioning stimuli (CS) of90–130% resting motor threshold (RMT) preceded test motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by 7 interstimulusintervals (ISIs) ranging 4–12 ms. In the DAO, we also examined IHI at 1–2 ms ISIs.Results:IHI was detected in the UT (CS 130% RMT; ISI 8 ms;p= 0.02) and FDI (CS 120% and 130% RMT, at8–10 ms ISIs;p= 0.004), but not in DAO at any ISI, instead, there was facilitation at 1–4 ms ISIs and110–130% RMT CS. In the DAO, conditioned responses at 1–4 ms ISIs were significantly larger than bothtest MEPs and the response induced by the CS alone.Conclusion:In the DAO there was no evidence of IHI even though this was clear in hand and axialmuscles. Control experiments excluded a transcallosal origin of the facilitation observed at the shortestintervals.Significance:Data suggest that integrated bilateral control of facial muscles occurs mainly at the level ofbrainstem circuits engaged by corticobulbar output from fM1.
Lack of evidence for interhemispheric inhibition in the lower face primary motor cortex / Ginatempo, Francesca; Manzo, Nicoletta; Rothwell, John C; Deriu, Franca. - In: CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 1872-8952. - 130:10(2019), pp. 1917-1925. [10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.027]
Lack of evidence for interhemispheric inhibition in the lower face primary motor cortex
Manzo, NicolettaSecondo
Investigation
;
2019
Abstract
Objective:To investigate interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between the facial primary motor cortices(fM1s).Methods:IHI was investigated in 10 healthy subjects using paired-pulse TMS in the depressor anguli oris(DAO), upper trapezius (UT) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. Conditioning stimuli (CS) of90–130% resting motor threshold (RMT) preceded test motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by 7 interstimulusintervals (ISIs) ranging 4–12 ms. In the DAO, we also examined IHI at 1–2 ms ISIs.Results:IHI was detected in the UT (CS 130% RMT; ISI 8 ms;p= 0.02) and FDI (CS 120% and 130% RMT, at8–10 ms ISIs;p= 0.004), but not in DAO at any ISI, instead, there was facilitation at 1–4 ms ISIs and110–130% RMT CS. In the DAO, conditioned responses at 1–4 ms ISIs were significantly larger than bothtest MEPs and the response induced by the CS alone.Conclusion:In the DAO there was no evidence of IHI even though this was clear in hand and axialmuscles. Control experiments excluded a transcallosal origin of the facilitation observed at the shortestintervals.Significance:Data suggest that integrated bilateral control of facial muscles occurs mainly at the level ofbrainstem circuits engaged by corticobulbar output from fM1.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ginatempo_Exploring the connectivity_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
279.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
279.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.