Process mining methods allow analysts to use logs of historical executions of business processes in order to gain knowledge about the actual behavior of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An event log is taken as input by an automated process discovery method and produces a business process model as output that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are described by the event log. In this setting, this paper provides a systematic comparative evaluation of existing implementations of automated process discovery methods with domain experts by using a real-life event log extracted from an international software engineering company and four quality metrics: understandability, correctness, precision, and usefulness. The evaluation results highlight gaps and unexplored trade-offs in the field and allow researchers to improve the lacks in the automated process discovery methods in terms of usability of process discovery techniques in industry.
A User Evaluation of Process Discovery Algorithms in a Software Engineering Company / Agostinelli, Simone; Maggi, Fabrizio Maria; Marrella, Andrea; Milani, Fredrik. - (2019), pp. 142-150. (Intervento presentato al convegno 23rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, EDOC 2019 tenutosi a Paris; France) [10.1109/EDOC.2019.00026].
A User Evaluation of Process Discovery Algorithms in a Software Engineering Company
Agostinelli, Simone
;Maggi, Fabrizio Maria
;Marrella, Andrea
;
2019
Abstract
Process mining methods allow analysts to use logs of historical executions of business processes in order to gain knowledge about the actual behavior of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An event log is taken as input by an automated process discovery method and produces a business process model as output that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are described by the event log. In this setting, this paper provides a systematic comparative evaluation of existing implementations of automated process discovery methods with domain experts by using a real-life event log extracted from an international software engineering company and four quality metrics: understandability, correctness, precision, and usefulness. The evaluation results highlight gaps and unexplored trade-offs in the field and allow researchers to improve the lacks in the automated process discovery methods in terms of usability of process discovery techniques in industry.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Agostinelli_Postprint_A-User-Evaluation_2019.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8944956
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
533.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
533.42 kB | Adobe PDF | |
Agostinelli_A-User-Evaluation_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
461.23 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
461.23 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.