Aims The aim of this study was to analyze the results of two radiocapitellar prostheses in a large case series followed prospectively, with medium-term follow-up. Patients and Methods A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 54 years (27 to 73) were analyzed; nine had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and 17 had post-traumatic OA, three had capitellar osteonecrosis, and two had a fracture. Overall, 17 Lateral Resurfacing Elbow (LRE) and 14 Uni-Elbow Radio-Capitellum Implant (UNI-E) arthroplasties were performed. Pre- and postoperative assessment involved the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the modified American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (m-ASES) score. Results The mean follow-up was 6.8 years (3.8 to 11.5). The mean MEPS, m-ASES, and Q-DASH scores improved significantly by 50 (p < 0.001), 55 (p < 0.001), and 54 points (p < 0.001), respectively, with no differences being detected between the implants. Preoperative pronation and supination were worse in patients in whom the UNI-E was used. Two patients with the UNI-E implant had asymptomatic evidence of gross loosening. Conclusion Radiocapitellar arthroplasty yielded a significant improvement in elbow function at a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, with a high implant survival rate when the LRE was used in patients with primary or post-traumatic OA, without radial head deformity, and when the UNI-E was used in patients in whom radial head excision was indicated.

Midterm results of radiocapitellar arthroplasty of the elbow: a multicentre prospective study on two different implants / Giannicola, G.; Calella, P.; Bigazzi, P.; Mantovani, A.; Spinello, P.; Cinotti, G.. - In: THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL. - ISSN 2049-4394. - 101-B:11(2019), pp. 1362-1369. [10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0155.R2]

Midterm results of radiocapitellar arthroplasty of the elbow: a multicentre prospective study on two different implants

Giannicola G.
;
Calella P.;Mantovani A.;Spinello P.;Cinotti G.
2019

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to analyze the results of two radiocapitellar prostheses in a large case series followed prospectively, with medium-term follow-up. Patients and Methods A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 54 years (27 to 73) were analyzed; nine had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and 17 had post-traumatic OA, three had capitellar osteonecrosis, and two had a fracture. Overall, 17 Lateral Resurfacing Elbow (LRE) and 14 Uni-Elbow Radio-Capitellum Implant (UNI-E) arthroplasties were performed. Pre- and postoperative assessment involved the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the modified American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (m-ASES) score. Results The mean follow-up was 6.8 years (3.8 to 11.5). The mean MEPS, m-ASES, and Q-DASH scores improved significantly by 50 (p < 0.001), 55 (p < 0.001), and 54 points (p < 0.001), respectively, with no differences being detected between the implants. Preoperative pronation and supination were worse in patients in whom the UNI-E was used. Two patients with the UNI-E implant had asymptomatic evidence of gross loosening. Conclusion Radiocapitellar arthroplasty yielded a significant improvement in elbow function at a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, with a high implant survival rate when the LRE was used in patients with primary or post-traumatic OA, without radial head deformity, and when the UNI-E was used in patients in whom radial head excision was indicated.
2019
elbow arthroplasty; elbow surgery; lateral resurfacing elbow; multicentre study; radiocapitellar arthroplasty; revision shoulder arthroplasty; uni-elbow; adult; aged; arthroplasty; replacement; elbow; elbow joint; elbow prosthesis; female; follow-up studies; humans; humeral fractures; male; middle aged; osteoarthritis; osteonecrosis; prosthesis failure; radius fractures; range of motion; articular; treatment outcome
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Midterm results of radiocapitellar arthroplasty of the elbow: a multicentre prospective study on two different implants / Giannicola, G.; Calella, P.; Bigazzi, P.; Mantovani, A.; Spinello, P.; Cinotti, G.. - In: THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL. - ISSN 2049-4394. - 101-B:11(2019), pp. 1362-1369. [10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0155.R2]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Giannicola_Midterm_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1346771
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact