Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) appears to be safe and effective as open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, studies comparing LLR with ORL in elderly patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of LLR versus OLR for HCC in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was made comparing laparoscopic (n = 11) and open (n = 18) liver resections in elderly patients performed at the University of Naples "Federico II'' between January 2010 and December 2014. Demographic data, operative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results Demographic and tumor characteristics of laparoscopic and OLRs were similar. There were also no significant differences in operating room time. Patients undergoing OLR had increased rate of minor complications (33 vs. 0%), longer lengths of stay (6 vs. 3 days) and higher blood loss (310 +/- 84 vs. 198 +/- 34 ml). There were no significant differences in major complication rates or 90-day mortality. Discussion LLR is safe and feasible as OLR for treatment of HCC in selected elderly patients.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC in elderly patients: risks and feasibility / Amato, Bruno; Aprea, Giovanni; De Rosa, Davide; Milone, Marco; di Domenico, Lorenza; Amato, Maurizio; Compagna, Rita; Santoro, Mario; Johnson, Louis Banka; Sanguinetti, Alessandro; Polistena, Andrea; Avenia, Nicola. - In: AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1594-0667. - 29:Suppl. 1(2017), pp. 179-183. (Intervento presentato al convegno 29th Congress of the Italian-Society-of-Geriatric-Surgery tenutosi a Rome) [10.1007/s40520-016-0675-6].

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC in elderly patients: risks and feasibility

Polistena, Andrea;
2017

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) appears to be safe and effective as open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, studies comparing LLR with ORL in elderly patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of LLR versus OLR for HCC in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was made comparing laparoscopic (n = 11) and open (n = 18) liver resections in elderly patients performed at the University of Naples "Federico II'' between January 2010 and December 2014. Demographic data, operative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results Demographic and tumor characteristics of laparoscopic and OLRs were similar. There were also no significant differences in operating room time. Patients undergoing OLR had increased rate of minor complications (33 vs. 0%), longer lengths of stay (6 vs. 3 days) and higher blood loss (310 +/- 84 vs. 198 +/- 34 ml). There were no significant differences in major complication rates or 90-day mortality. Discussion LLR is safe and feasible as OLR for treatment of HCC in selected elderly patients.
2017
29th Congress of the Italian-Society-of-Geriatric-Surgery
Elder; HCC; Hepathectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Aging; Geriatrics and Gerontology
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC in elderly patients: risks and feasibility / Amato, Bruno; Aprea, Giovanni; De Rosa, Davide; Milone, Marco; di Domenico, Lorenza; Amato, Maurizio; Compagna, Rita; Santoro, Mario; Johnson, Louis Banka; Sanguinetti, Alessandro; Polistena, Andrea; Avenia, Nicola. - In: AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1594-0667. - 29:Suppl. 1(2017), pp. 179-183. (Intervento presentato al convegno 29th Congress of the Italian-Society-of-Geriatric-Surgery tenutosi a Rome) [10.1007/s40520-016-0675-6].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Amato_Laparoscopic-hepathectomy_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 263.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
263.04 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1338664
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact