Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) appears to be safe and effective as open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign or borderline malignant lesion. However, studies comparing LDP with ODP in elderly patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of these two several approaches in elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out by comparing laparoscopic (n = 7) and open (n = 15) distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients performed at the University of Naples "Federico II" and University of Perugia between January 2012 and December 2015. Demographic data, operative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Demographic and tumor characteristics of laparoscopic and ODP were similar. There were also no significant differences in operating room time. Patients undergoing LDP had lower blood loss, first flatus time, diet start time and postoperative hospital stay. There were no significant differences in complication rates or 90-day mortality. Discussion: LDP is safe and feasible as ODP in selected elderly patients.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients. Is it safe? / Aprea, Giovanni; De Rosa, Davide; Milone, Marco; Rocca, Aldo; Bianco, Tommaso; Massa, Guido; Compagna, Rita; Johnson Louis, Banka; Sanguinetti, Alessandro; Polistena, Andrea; Avenia, Nicola; Amato, Bruno. - In: AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1594-0667. - 29:Suppl. 1(2017), pp. 41-45. [10.1007/s40520-016-0677-4]

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients. Is it safe?

Polistena Andrea
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2017

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) appears to be safe and effective as open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign or borderline malignant lesion. However, studies comparing LDP with ODP in elderly patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of these two several approaches in elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out by comparing laparoscopic (n = 7) and open (n = 15) distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients performed at the University of Naples "Federico II" and University of Perugia between January 2012 and December 2015. Demographic data, operative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Demographic and tumor characteristics of laparoscopic and ODP were similar. There were also no significant differences in operating room time. Patients undergoing LDP had lower blood loss, first flatus time, diet start time and postoperative hospital stay. There were no significant differences in complication rates or 90-day mortality. Discussion: LDP is safe and feasible as ODP in selected elderly patients.
2017
Distal pancreasectomy; Elderly; Robotic surgery; Age Factors; Aged; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Operative Time; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Postoperative Period; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Aging; Geriatrics and Gerontology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients. Is it safe? / Aprea, Giovanni; De Rosa, Davide; Milone, Marco; Rocca, Aldo; Bianco, Tommaso; Massa, Guido; Compagna, Rita; Johnson Louis, Banka; Sanguinetti, Alessandro; Polistena, Andrea; Avenia, Nicola; Amato, Bruno. - In: AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1594-0667. - 29:Suppl. 1(2017), pp. 41-45. [10.1007/s40520-016-0677-4]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
aprea_Laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 233.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
233.9 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1338561
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact