Leo Weisgerber’s and Jost Trier’s Wortfeldtheorie is still considered the most consistent outcome of post-Saussurean structural semantics as well as the first step towards an “ontological structuralism”. One of their aims was to reconcile the impasse born out of Wilhelm von Humboldt’s distinction between Energeia and Ergon, which exploded in the 20th century dispute between structural semantics and cognitive and pragmatic approaches. If Neo-Humboldtians hastened the “structuralist turn”, Trier’s theory contains insights still relevant in the theories of language focusing on the interactions between language, thought, and reality.
The Neo-Humboldtian lexical field theory. Origin, reception and perspectives / Diodato, Filomena. - In: PARADIGMI. - ISSN 1120-3404. - 2(2019), pp. 259-274. [10.30460/94068]
The Neo-Humboldtian lexical field theory. Origin, reception and perspectives
Filomena Diodato
2019
Abstract
Leo Weisgerber’s and Jost Trier’s Wortfeldtheorie is still considered the most consistent outcome of post-Saussurean structural semantics as well as the first step towards an “ontological structuralism”. One of their aims was to reconcile the impasse born out of Wilhelm von Humboldt’s distinction between Energeia and Ergon, which exploded in the 20th century dispute between structural semantics and cognitive and pragmatic approaches. If Neo-Humboldtians hastened the “structuralist turn”, Trier’s theory contains insights still relevant in the theories of language focusing on the interactions between language, thought, and reality.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Diodato_Neo-Humboldtian_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
376.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
376.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.